CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.02.021
Nitrous oxide from streams and rivers: A review of primary biogeochemical pathways and environmental variables
Quick A.M.; Reeder W.J.; Farrell T.B.; Tonina D.; Feris K.P.; Benner S.G.
发表日期2019
ISSN00128252
起始页码224
结束页码262
卷号191
英文摘要Atmospheric concentrations of the powerful greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N 2 O) have increased dramatically over the last 100 years, and part of these emissions come from streams and rivers. N 2 O production has been more carefully studied in soils, but runoff of reactive nitrogen, likely from fertilizer, influences lotic N 2 O emissions. N 2 O production and consumption are strongly microbially mediated and mostly involve oxidation and reduction of the reactive nitrogen species ammonia, nitrate, and nitrite. Of the four main pathways leading to N 2 O production in soils and sediments, incomplete denitrification is likely the globally dominant N 2 O generating pathway and is favored by elevated nitrate concentrations, suboxic conditions, and sufficient organic carbon to promote reduction. The two pathways that oxidize ammonia, nitrifier denitrification and nitrification, are favored with higher concentrations of dissolved oxygen and ammonia. It is often difficult to distinguish these two pathways in field settings, but most evidence suggests that nitrifier-denitrification is likely the globally more significant of the two. The fourth reaction pathway is dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonia (DNRA), in which N 2 O may be produced from intermediate nitrite. This pathway is more recently discovered, and its global relevance remains uncertain. The key variables influencing N 2 O cycling, concentrations of the primary reactants (nitrate and ammonia), organic carbon, and dissolved oxygen (DO), may vary temporally with season and time of day. Increasing nitrate and ammonia generally result in higher N 2 O production. Elevated carbon availability generally promotes denitrification. However, N 2 O yield is generally higher when carbon is less available or less reactive. Efforts to quantify N 2 O in lotic settings include mostly studies of N 2 O dissolved in or emitted from surface water, with fewer studies of N 2 O produced or emitted from sediments. With some exceptions and limits, N 2 O emissions are generally positively correlated with nitrate concentration (and in some cases, ammonia concentration). Most studies observe more N 2 O emissions with low DO. Lotic N 2 O emissions were generally higher in the warmer months and at night. Most studies assume a denitrification source for N 2 O, except in the case of high DO and NH 4 + , in which nitrification is assumed. Lotic N 2 O production and consumption may take place in the hyporheic zone along groundwater flow paths and in the water column of streams and rivers. Because microbial nitrogen processing requires substrate, influx of reactants, appropriate redox conditions, and intermediate residence times, the hyporheic zone is likely the site of most N 2 O production. However, high rates of N 2 O production may also occur associated with suspended sediments in turbid streams and rivers. Models that combine hydromorphogical and chemical variables are most likely to provide the best predictions of N 2 O emissions. Such models and some observations suggest that N 2 O emissions decrease downstream as sedimentary processes (likely denitrification) decrease relative to processes in the surface water (likely nitrification). Downstream sites could have large N 2 O emissions, however, due to inputs of nitrate or ammonia. Better quantification of lotic N 2 O processing will inform the emission factors incorporated into greenhouse gas budgets. Both quantification and mitigation of N 2 O emissions will benefit from future research that more closely examines the biogeochemical pathways and physical settings for N 2 O production and consumption. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.
英文关键词ammonia; biogeochemistry; nitrous oxide; oxidation; river; stream; water quality
语种英语
来源期刊Earth Science Reviews
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/203539
作者单位Department of Geosciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, United States; Department of Civil Engineering, University of Idaho, Boise, ID 83702, United States; Department of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, United States
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Quick A.M.,Reeder W.J.,Farrell T.B.,et al. Nitrous oxide from streams and rivers: A review of primary biogeochemical pathways and environmental variables[J],2019,191.
APA Quick A.M.,Reeder W.J.,Farrell T.B.,Tonina D.,Feris K.P.,&Benner S.G..(2019).Nitrous oxide from streams and rivers: A review of primary biogeochemical pathways and environmental variables.Earth Science Reviews,191.
MLA Quick A.M.,et al."Nitrous oxide from streams and rivers: A review of primary biogeochemical pathways and environmental variables".Earth Science Reviews 191(2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Quick A.M.]的文章
[Reeder W.J.]的文章
[Farrell T.B.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Quick A.M.]的文章
[Reeder W.J.]的文章
[Farrell T.B.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Quick A.M.]的文章
[Reeder W.J.]的文章
[Farrell T.B.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。