CCPortal
DOI10.1039/d0ee00716a
Energy, economic, and environmental benefits assessment of co-optimized engines and bio-blendstocks
Dunn J.B.; Newes E.; Cai H.; Zhang Y.; Brooker A.; Ou L.; Mundt N.; Bhatt A.; Peterson S.; Biddy M.
发表日期2020
ISSN17545692
起始页码2262
结束页码2274
卷号13期号:8
英文摘要Advances in fuel and engine design that improve engine efficiency could lower the total cost of vehicle ownership for consumers, support economic development, and offer environmental benefits. Two fuel properties that can enhance the efficiency of boosted spark ignition engines are research octane number and octane sensitivity. Biomass feedstocks can produce fuel blendstocks with these properties. Correspondingly, using a suite of models, we evaluated the change in energy and water consumption and greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions in the light duty fleet from 2025 to 2050 when bio-blendstocks isopropanol, a methylfuran mixture, and ethanol are blended at 31%, 14%, and 17%, respectively, with petroleum. These blended fuels increase engine efficiency by 10% when used with a co-optimized engine. In these scenarios, we estimated that petroleum consumption would decrease by between 5-9% in 2050 alone and likely by similar levels in future years as compared to a business as usual case defined by energy information administration projections. Overall, between 2025 and 2050, we determined that, when isopropanol is the bio-blendstock, GHG emissions, water consumption, and PM2.5 emission cumulative reductions could range from 4-7%, 3-4%, and 3%, respectively. Cumulative reductions would continue to increase beyond 2025 as the technology would gain an increasing foothold, indicating the importance of allowing time for technology penetration to achieve desired benefits. Annual jobs increased between 0.2 and 1.7 million in the case in which isopropanol was the bio-blendstock. Overall, this analysis provides a framework for evaluating the benefits of deploying co-optimized fuels and engines considering multiple energy, environmental, and economic factors. © 2020 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
英文关键词Air pollution; Gas emissions; Gasoline; Greenhouse gases; Machine design; Water pollution; Air pollutant emission; Biomass feedstock; Business-as-usual; Energy Information Administration; Environmental benefits; Petroleum consumption; Research octane number; Water consumption; Engines; assessment method; chemical compound; economic conditions; efficiency measurement; optimization; performance assessment; petroleum
语种英语
来源期刊Energy & Environmental Science
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/189582
作者单位Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, United States; National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, United States; Lexidyne, LLC, Colorado Springs, CO, United States
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Dunn J.B.,Newes E.,Cai H.,et al. Energy, economic, and environmental benefits assessment of co-optimized engines and bio-blendstocks[J],2020,13(8).
APA Dunn J.B..,Newes E..,Cai H..,Zhang Y..,Brooker A..,...&Biddy M..(2020).Energy, economic, and environmental benefits assessment of co-optimized engines and bio-blendstocks.Energy & Environmental Science,13(8).
MLA Dunn J.B.,et al."Energy, economic, and environmental benefits assessment of co-optimized engines and bio-blendstocks".Energy & Environmental Science 13.8(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Dunn J.B.]的文章
[Newes E.]的文章
[Cai H.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Dunn J.B.]的文章
[Newes E.]的文章
[Cai H.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Dunn J.B.]的文章
[Newes E.]的文章
[Cai H.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。