CCPortal
DOI10.1080/14693062.2019.1704678
Loss and damage in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (Working Group II): a text-mining analysis
van der Geest K.; Warner K.
发表日期2020
ISSN1469-3062
卷号20期号:6
英文摘要‘Losses and damages’ refer to impacts of climate change that have not been, or cannot be, avoided through mitigation and adaptation efforts. After the establishment of the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage (WIM), Loss and Damage is now considered the third pillar–besides mitigation and adaptation–of climate action under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This paper studies what the Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC WGII AR5) has to say about this emerging topic. We use qualitative data analysis software (text mining) to assess which climatic stressors, impact sectors and regions the report primarily associates with losses and damages, and compare this with the focus areas of the WIM. The study reveals that IPCC WGII AR5 primarily associates losses and damages with extreme weather events and economic impacts, and treats it primarily as a future risk. Present-day losses and damages from slow-onset processes and non-economic losses receive much less attention. Also, surprisingly, AR5 has more to say about losses and damages in high-income regions than in regions that are most at risk, such as small island states and least developed countries. The paper concludes with recommendations to the IPCC for its 6th Assessment Report (AR6) to include more evidence on losses and damages from slow-onset processes, non-economic losses and damages and losses and damages in vulnerable countries. Key policy insights IPCC WGII AR5 discusses evidence about losses and damages predominantly in relation to sudden-onset disasters and economic costs. More research is needed on losses and damages from slow-onset processes and non-economic loss and damage, particularly in vulnerable countries in the Global South. Funding agencies should support research in these areas and IPCC WGII AR6 should pay more attention to these topics. Losses and damages are not only a future risk, but already a present-day reality for vulnerable people in climate hotspots. People-centred research by social scientists is crucial for enhancing understanding of what losses and damages mean in the real world. © 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
英文关键词adaptation limits and constraints; climate change; impacts; IPCC; Loss and damage; vulnerability
来源期刊CLIMATE POLICY
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/183735
作者单位United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security, Bonn, Germany
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
van der Geest K.,Warner K.. Loss and damage in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (Working Group II): a text-mining analysis[J],2020,20(6).
APA van der Geest K.,&Warner K..(2020).Loss and damage in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (Working Group II): a text-mining analysis.CLIMATE POLICY,20(6).
MLA van der Geest K.,et al."Loss and damage in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (Working Group II): a text-mining analysis".CLIMATE POLICY 20.6(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[van der Geest K.]的文章
[Warner K.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[van der Geest K.]的文章
[Warner K.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[van der Geest K.]的文章
[Warner K.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。