气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Sub- and non-state climate action: a framework to assess progress, implementation and impact

CCPortal

DOI	10.1080/14693062.2020.1828796
	Sub- and non-state climate action: a framework to assess progress, implementation and impact
	Hale T.N.; Chan S.; Hsu A.; Clapper A.; Elliott C.; Faria P.; Kuramochi T.; McDaniel S.; Morgado M.; Roelfsema M.; Santaella M.; Singh N.; Tout I.; Weber C.; Weinfurter A.; Widerberg O.
发表日期	2021
ISSN	1469-3062
起始页码	161
结束页码	176
卷号	21 期号:3
英文摘要	The rising importance of cities, states and regions, firms, investors, and other subnational and non-state actors in global and national responses to climate change raises a critical question: to what extent does this climate action deliver results? This article introduces a conceptual framework that researchers and practitioners can use as a template to assess the progress, implementation, and impact of climate action by sub- and non-state actors. This framework is used to review existing studies that track progress, implementation, and achievement of such climate action between 2014 and mid-2019. While researchers have made important advances in assessing the scope and future potential of sub- and non-state climate action, we find knowledge gaps around ex-post achievement of results, indirect impacts, and climate action beyond the realm of greenhouse gas reductions. Key policy insights While we increasingly understand the scale, scope, and potential of climate action by sub- and non-state actors, we lack rigorous evidence regarding the results achieved and their broader impacts. More information on progress and impact is essential for the credibility of sub- and non-state climate action. Policymakers need to understand which approaches are working and which are not, promoting the diffusion of best practice and creating conditions for stronger action in the future. The proposed conceptual framework can be tailored and applied to a wide range of initiatives that target mitigation, adaptation, and other spheres of climate action. By providing a template to identify key elements of progress tracking and evaluation, the framework can help align both research and practitioner communities around the data and metrics required to understand the overall impact of climate action. © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
英文关键词	benchmarking; business; cities; Climate action; effectiveness; progress; transnational governance
来源期刊	CLIMATE POLICY
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/183685
作者单位	Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Bonn, Germany; Global Center on Adaptation (GCA), Groningen, Netherlands; Yale-NUS College, Singapore, Singapore; CDP, New York, NY, United States; World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, United States; NewClimate Institute and Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Cologne, Germany; Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy, Brussels, Belgium; The Climate Group, London, United Kingdom; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat, Bonn, Germany; World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC, United States; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Hale T.N.,Chan S.,Hsu A.,et al. Sub- and non-state climate action: a framework to assess progress, implementation and impact[J],2021,21(3).
APA	Hale T.N..,Chan S..,Hsu A..,Clapper A..,Elliott C..,...&Widerberg O..(2021).Sub- and non-state climate action: a framework to assess progress, implementation and impact.CLIMATE POLICY,21(3).
MLA	Hale T.N.,et al."Sub- and non-state climate action: a framework to assess progress, implementation and impact".CLIMATE POLICY 21.3(2021).