CCPortal
DOI10.1073/pnas.2020589118
Hegemonic masculinity predicts 2016 and 2020 voting and candidate evaluations
Vescio T.K.; Schermerhorn N.E.C.
发表日期2021
ISSN00278424
卷号118期号:2
英文摘要This work examined whether the endorsement of the culturally idealized form of masculinity-hegemonic masculinity (HM)-accounted for unique variance in men's and women's support for Donald Trump across seven studies (n = 2,007). Consistent with our theoretical backdrop, in the days (Studies 1 and 2) and months (Studies 3 through 6) following the 2016 American presidential election, women's and men's endorsement of HM predicted voting for and evaluations of Trump, over and above political party affiliation, gender, race, and education. These effects held when controlling for respondents' trust in the government, in contrast to a populist explanation of support for Trump. In addition, as conceptualized, HM was associated with less trust in the government (Study 3), more sexism (Study 4), more racism (Study 5), and more xenophobia (Study 6) but continued to predict unique variance in evaluations of Trump when controlling for each of these factors. Whereas HM predicted evaluations of Trump, across studies, social and prejudiced attitudes predicted evaluations of his democratic challengers: Clinton in 2016 and Biden in 2020. We replicate the findings of Studies 1 through 6 using a nationally representative sample of the United States (Study 7) 50 days prior to the 2020 presidential election. The findings highlight the importance of psychological examinations of masculinity as a cultural ideology to understand how men's and women's endorsement of HM legitimizes patriarchal dominance and reinforces gender, race, and class-based hierarchies via candidate support. © This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).
英文关键词Hegmony; Masculinity; Political attitudes; Racism; Sexism
语种英语
scopus关键词adult; article; attitude; education; election; female; government; human; human experiment; ideology; major clinical study; male; masculinity; psychologic test; racism; sexism; theoretical study; trust; xenophobia
来源期刊Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/181052
作者单位Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Vescio T.K.,Schermerhorn N.E.C.. Hegemonic masculinity predicts 2016 and 2020 voting and candidate evaluations[J],2021,118(2).
APA Vescio T.K.,&Schermerhorn N.E.C..(2021).Hegemonic masculinity predicts 2016 and 2020 voting and candidate evaluations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,118(2).
MLA Vescio T.K.,et al."Hegemonic masculinity predicts 2016 and 2020 voting and candidate evaluations".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118.2(2021).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Vescio T.K.]的文章
[Schermerhorn N.E.C.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Vescio T.K.]的文章
[Schermerhorn N.E.C.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Vescio T.K.]的文章
[Schermerhorn N.E.C.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。