气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Erratum: Experimental and statistical reevaluation provides no evidence for Drosophila courtship song rhythms (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States (2021) 114 (9978-9983) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1707471114)

CCPortal

DOI	10.1073/pnas.2100258118
	Erratum: Experimental and statistical reevaluation provides no evidence for Drosophila courtship song rhythms (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States (2021) 114 (9978-9983) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1707471114)
	Stern D.L.; Clemens J.; Coen P.; Calhoun A.J.; Hogenesch J.B.; Arthur B.J.; Murthy M.
发表日期	2021
ISSN	00278424
卷号	118 期号:6
英文摘要	The authors wish to note the following: “It has been brought to our attention that our computer code for calculating cosinor statistics inadvertently used the frequency in degrees and not in radians, leading to an underestimate of the frequency of true positives. We have corrected the code available on github (https://github.com/murthylab/noIPIcycles) and recalculated the statistics that appeared in Fig. S1. The new Fig. S1 illustrates that true positives occur more frequently than positives in the shuffled data. However, cosinor still demonstrates a substantial false positive rate (the positives present in shuffled data). In addition, the positives for natural song are dispersed across a wide range of period (20-150 s), as we illustrated previously using other methods to estimate periodicity, and do not tend to cluster near 60 s, which is the approximate periodicity that has been implicated previously for interpulse interval cycles (i.e., K-H cycles). In fact, half of the periodicities detected are faster than 40 s. As we discussed in the original paper, rare periodicity scattered across a wide frequency range is more consistent with a model in which male flies modulate their interpulse interval in response to social cues than it is with a model in which an internal clock drives regular periodicity. This corrected analysis therefore still supports our earlier conclusion that there is no statistical evidence that flies sing pulse song with interpulse intervals that cycle with a regular periodicity.” As a result of this error, Fig. S1 in the SI Appendix and its legend appeared incorrectly. The SI Appendix has been corrected online. © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
语种	英语
scopus关键词	erratum
来源期刊	Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/180707
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Stern D.L.,Clemens J.,Coen P.,et al. Erratum: Experimental and statistical reevaluation provides no evidence for Drosophila courtship song rhythms (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States (2021) 114 (9978-9983) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1707471114)[J],2021,118(6).
APA	Stern D.L..,Clemens J..,Coen P..,Calhoun A.J..,Hogenesch J.B..,...&Murthy M..(2021).Erratum: Experimental and statistical reevaluation provides no evidence for Drosophila courtship song rhythms (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States (2021) 114 (9978-9983) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1707471114).Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,118(6).
MLA	Stern D.L.,et al."Erratum: Experimental and statistical reevaluation provides no evidence for Drosophila courtship song rhythms (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States (2021) 114 (9978-9983) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1707471114)".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118.6(2021).