CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.rse.2021.112442
Assessing map accuracy from a suite of site-specific, non-site specific, and spatial distribution approaches.
Nelson M.D.; Garner J.D.; Tavernia B.G.; Stehman S.V.; Riemann R.I.; Lister A.J.; Perry C.H.
发表日期2021
ISSN00344257
卷号260
英文摘要Assessing a map's accuracy and efficacy requires careful consideration and calculation of a comprehensive set of measures, particularly when characteristics in geospatial datasets may be used for addressing multiple objectives. We describe a map accuracy assessment framework for categorical geospatial data over large areas that utilizes site-specific (plot-pixel), non-site specific (area estimates), and comparative accuracy (spatial and statistical distributions) methods. This comprehensive framework spans the range of approaches applied in most other studies, maximizing opportunities for both within- and between-study comparisons. The analysis framework incorporated recommended good practices for sampling design, response design, analysis protocols, and design-based inference for providing rigorous estimates of accuracy and precision. Further partitioning of disagreement allows users to assess the relative importance of spatial location versus total abundance of map classes to map error; we introduced a ratio of allocation disagreement to quantity disagreement for comparing relative importance of each across datasets. Assessment of fuzzy membership with linguistic scales may have minimal effect on overall accuracy, but can provide substantial improvement in user's accuracy and producer's accuracy for uncommon classes. We adapted non-site specific approaches to provide metrics and insights into spatial variability of map accuracy of thematic classes. Comparing estimates based on reference data and co-located samples of map data may reveal potential issues with reference data. We demonstrated example applications all components of the assessment framework for thematic maps of early successional forest and other land cover classes across the western Great Lakes region, USA. © 2021
英文关键词Assessment framework; Map validation
语种英语
scopus关键词Importance sampling; Accuracy assessment; Assessment framework; Geo-spatial; Geo-spatial data; Map validation; Multiple-objectives; Reference data; Site-specific; Specific areas; Statistical distribution; Maps; accuracy assessment; assessment method; isoseismal map; land cover; map; pixel; precision; spatial distribution; Great Lakes [North America]; United States
来源期刊Remote Sensing of Environment
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/178848
作者单位USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 1992 Folwell Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, United States; National Audubon Society, Western Water Initiative, 231 West 800 South, Ste. E., Salt Lake City, UT 84101, United States; SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 322 Bray Hall, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States; USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 425 Joran Road, Troy, NY 12180, United States; USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 3460 Industrial Drive, York, PA 17402, United States
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Nelson M.D.,Garner J.D.,Tavernia B.G.,et al. Assessing map accuracy from a suite of site-specific, non-site specific, and spatial distribution approaches.[J],2021,260.
APA Nelson M.D..,Garner J.D..,Tavernia B.G..,Stehman S.V..,Riemann R.I..,...&Perry C.H..(2021).Assessing map accuracy from a suite of site-specific, non-site specific, and spatial distribution approaches..Remote Sensing of Environment,260.
MLA Nelson M.D.,et al."Assessing map accuracy from a suite of site-specific, non-site specific, and spatial distribution approaches.".Remote Sensing of Environment 260(2021).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Nelson M.D.]的文章
[Garner J.D.]的文章
[Tavernia B.G.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Nelson M.D.]的文章
[Garner J.D.]的文章
[Tavernia B.G.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Nelson M.D.]的文章
[Garner J.D.]的文章
[Tavernia B.G.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。