Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0182.1 |
Evaluation of the tail of the probability distribution of daily and subdaily precipitation in CMIP6 models | |
Norris J.; Hall A.; Neelin J.D.; Thackeray C.W.; Chen D. | |
发表日期 | 2021 |
ISSN | 08948755 |
起始页码 | 2701 |
结束页码 | 2721 |
卷号 | 34期号:7 |
英文摘要 | Daily and subdaily precipitation extremes in historical phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) simulations are evaluated against satellite-based observational estimates. Extremes are defined as the precipitation amount exceeded every x years, ranging from 0.01 to 10, encompassing the rarest events that are detectable in the observational record without noisy results. With increasing temporal resolution there is an increased discrepancy between models and observations: for daily extremes, the multimodel median underestimates the highest percentiles by about a third, and for 3-hourly extremes by about 75% in the tropics. The novelty of the current study is that, to understand the model spread, we evaluate the 3D structure of the atmosphere when extremes occur. In midlatitudes, where extremes are simulated predominantly explicitly, the intuitive relationship exists whereby higher-resolution models produce larger extremes (r = -0.49), via greater vertical velocity. In the tropics, the convective fraction (the fraction of precipitation simulated directly from the convective scheme) is more relevant. For models below 60% convective fraction, precipitation amount decreases with convective fraction (r = -0.63), but above 75% convective fraction, this relationship breaks down. In the lower-convective-fraction models, there is more moisture in the lower troposphere, closer to saturation. In the higher-convective-fraction models, there is deeper convection and higher cloud tops, which appears to be more physical. Thus, the low-convective models are mostly closer to the observations of extreme precipitation in the tropics, but likely for the wrong reasons. These intermodel differences in the environment in which extremes are simulated hold clues into how parameterizations could be modified in general circulation models to produce more credible twenty-first-century projections. © 2021 American Meteorological Society. |
英文关键词 | Atmosphere; Convection; Extreme events; General circulation models; Precipitation; Vertical motion |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Precipitation (meteorology); Tropics; Coupled Model Intercomparison Project; Extreme precipitation; General circulation model; Higher resolution; Lower troposphere; Precipitation extremes; Temporal resolution; Vertical velocity; Probability distributions; atmospheric convection; CMIP; extreme event; general circulation model; parameterization; precipitation (climatology); probability; vertical distribution |
来源期刊 | Journal of Climate
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/178593 |
作者单位 | Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Norris J.,Hall A.,Neelin J.D.,et al. Evaluation of the tail of the probability distribution of daily and subdaily precipitation in CMIP6 models[J],2021,34(7). |
APA | Norris J.,Hall A.,Neelin J.D.,Thackeray C.W.,&Chen D..(2021).Evaluation of the tail of the probability distribution of daily and subdaily precipitation in CMIP6 models.Journal of Climate,34(7). |
MLA | Norris J.,et al."Evaluation of the tail of the probability distribution of daily and subdaily precipitation in CMIP6 models".Journal of Climate 34.7(2021). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。