Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2019.05.003 |
Probabilistic comparison between turbulence closure model and Bulk Richardson Number approach for ABL height estimation using copula | |
Upadhyay S.; Das S.K.; Ojha C.S.P. | |
发表日期 | 2019 |
ISSN | 03770265 |
卷号 | 87 |
英文摘要 | In this paper, a numerical study has been carried out to assess changes in Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL) height under changing hydro-climatic conditions. ABL height is estimated by using the data from experiments conducted at three different sites- LAnd Surface Process EXperiment (LASPEX-97) in Sabarmati river basin, Gujarat, India, during 1997; Boundary Layer Late Afternoon and Sunset Turbulence (BLLAST) in Lannemezan, France, during 2011 and Integrated Global Radiosonde Archive (IGRA) in Tucson at Arizona, USA, during 2011. Here ABL height is estimated, during Intensive Observation Period (IOP), using 1-D turbulence closure model at all three site locations as well as following the Bulk Richardson Number (BRN) Approach. For LASPEX-97 only, the 1-D model with module for sub-surface processes coupled with upper-surface model is used for the estimation and compared with the only upper-surface model. ABL height, estimated by the coupled model, is found to be slightly higher than that by the un-coupled model. A copula-based analysis indicates that ABL height estimated by the 1-D model and same by BRN-based approach are statistically similar within 90% confidence interval (CI) under similar stratification condition. Thus, it validates the 1-D turbulence closure model for ABL height estimation. The sensitivity analysis of height of ABL, derived by 1-D model, against critical parameters reveals that surface condition (soil temperature) is more critical than atmospheric condition (net radiation) in forcing change on height of ABL in summer. © 2019 Elsevier B.V. |
英文关键词 | Atmospheric Boundary Layer; Bulk Richardson Number; Copula; Turbulence Closure Model |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Atmospheric boundary layer; Sensitivity analysis; Turbulence; Atmospheric conditions; Bulk Richardson number; Climatic conditions; Confidence interval; Copula; Intensive observation periods; Land-surface process; Turbulence closure models; Atmospheric thermodynamics; boundary layer; height determination; one-dimensional modeling; probability; Richardson number; sensitivity analysis; soil temperature; turbulence; Arizona; France; Haute Pyrenees; India; Lannemezan; Occitanie; Sabarmati Basin; Tucson; United States |
来源期刊 | Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/178369 |
作者单位 | Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee RoorkeeUttarakhand, India |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Upadhyay S.,Das S.K.,Ojha C.S.P.. Probabilistic comparison between turbulence closure model and Bulk Richardson Number approach for ABL height estimation using copula[J],2019,87. |
APA | Upadhyay S.,Das S.K.,&Ojha C.S.P..(2019).Probabilistic comparison between turbulence closure model and Bulk Richardson Number approach for ABL height estimation using copula.Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans,87. |
MLA | Upadhyay S.,et al."Probabilistic comparison between turbulence closure model and Bulk Richardson Number approach for ABL height estimation using copula".Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans 87(2019). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。