Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.227 |
Multi-objective optimization of energy arbitrage in community energy storage systems using different battery technologies | |
Terlouw T.; AlSkaif T.; Bauer C.; van Sark W. | |
发表日期 | 2019 |
ISSN | 3062619 |
起始页码 | 356 |
结束页码 | 372 |
卷号 | 239 |
英文摘要 | The power system requires an additional amount of flexibility to process the large-scale integration of renewable energy sources. Community Energy Storage (CES) is one of the solutions to offer flexibility. In this paper two scenarios of CES ownership are proposed. Firstly, an Energy Arbitrage (EA) scenario is studied where an aggregator aims to minimize costs and CO2-emissions of an energy portfolio. Secondly, an Energy Arbitrage - Peak Shaving (EA-PS) scenario is assessed, which is based on a shared ownership between a Distribution System Operator (DSO) and an aggregator. A multi-objective Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) optimization model is developed to minimize the operation costs and CO2-emissions of a community situated in Cernier (Switzerland), using different battery technologies in the CES system. The results demonstrate a profitable system design for all Lithium-ion-Batteries (LiBs) and the Vanadium Redox Flow Battery (VRFB), for both the EA and EA-PS scenarios. The economic and environmental performance of the EA-PS scenario is slightly worse compared to the EA scenario, due to power boundaries on grid absorption and injection to achieve peak shaving. Overall, the differences between the EA and EA-PS scenarios, in economic and environmental performance, are small. Therefore, the EA-PS is recommended to prevent problematic loads on the distribution transformer. In addition, the Pareto frontiers demonstrate that LiBs perform best on both economic and environmental performance, with the best economic and environmental performance for the Lithium-Nickel-Manganese-Cobalt (NMC-C) battery. The Author(s) |
英文关键词 | Battery technologies; Community energy storage; Energy arbitrage; Multi-objective optimization; Peak shaving |
scopus关键词 | Carbon dioxide; Digital instruments; Electric power system economics; Electric transformers; Energy storage; Environmental management; Financial markets; Flow batteries; Integer programming; Lithium-ion batteries; Renewable energy resources; Battery technology; Community energy; Community energy storages (CES); Economic and environmental performance; Energy arbitrages; Mixed-integer linear programming; Peak shaving; Vanadium redox flow batteries; Multiobjective optimization; alternative energy; carbon emission; economic conditions; energy resource; energy storage; equipment; optimization; technological change; Switzerland |
来源期刊 | Applied Energy
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/176457 |
作者单位 | Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8a, Utrecht, CB 3584, Netherlands; Paul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory for Energy Systems Analysis, Villigen PSI, 5232, Switzerland |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Terlouw T.,AlSkaif T.,Bauer C.,et al. Multi-objective optimization of energy arbitrage in community energy storage systems using different battery technologies[J],2019,239. |
APA | Terlouw T.,AlSkaif T.,Bauer C.,&van Sark W..(2019).Multi-objective optimization of energy arbitrage in community energy storage systems using different battery technologies.Applied Energy,239. |
MLA | Terlouw T.,et al."Multi-objective optimization of energy arbitrage in community energy storage systems using different battery technologies".Applied Energy 239(2019). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。