Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1038/s41893-020-0528-3 |
Best-practice biodiversity safeguards for Belt and Road Initiative’s financiers | |
Narain D.; Maron M.; Teo H.C.; Hussey K.; Lechner A.M. | |
发表日期 | 2020 |
ISSN | 2398-9629 |
起始页码 | 650 |
结束页码 | 657 |
卷号 | 3期号:8 |
英文摘要 | With thousands of projects being built along eight transcontinental corridors, China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is driving the global infrastructure boom. BRI is likely to have a sizeable biodiversity footprint as its corridors overlap several priority areas for conservation and 150,000 km2 of critical habitat. Biodiversity safeguards for the initiative therefore warrant scrutiny. Biodiversity safeguards are policies or standards (adopted by regulators, project proponents or financiers) that specify biodiversity impact mitigation measures. Here we examine a key source of safeguards—lending requirements of BRI’s financiers. We compare them with International Finance Corporation’s Performance Standard 6, which is often regarded as international best practice and which requires projects affecting ‘critical habitat’ to achieve a ‘net gain’ of biodiversity through impact mitigation. We find that of the 65 financiers identified (35 Chinese and 30 international), just 17 require biodiversity impact mitigation and 12 require a ‘net gain’. Among those with biodiversity safeguards, 16 are international, and despite the Chinese financiers accounting for over 90% of BRI’s financing (by quantum of investment), only 1 of the 35 we identified has biodiversity safeguards. Because most BRI finance is not subject to biodiversity safeguards, we conclude that potential impacts of BRI linear infrastructure projects may remain unmitigated, despite approximately 369,000 km2 of critical and natural habitat occurring within the 25 km buffer zone of such projects. We therefore argue for urgent adherence to best-practice safeguards for all institutions financing the BRI. © 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited. |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Ecosystems; International trade; Investments; Roads and streets; Best practices; Global infrastructure; Impact mitigation; International finance corporations; Linear infrastructure; Natural habitat; Performance standards; Potential impacts; Biodiversity |
来源期刊 | Nature Sustainability
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/163375 |
作者单位 | School of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; School of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih, Malaysia; Centre for Policy Futures, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Narain D.,Maron M.,Teo H.C.,等. Best-practice biodiversity safeguards for Belt and Road Initiative’s financiers[J],2020,3(8). |
APA | Narain D.,Maron M.,Teo H.C.,Hussey K.,&Lechner A.M..(2020).Best-practice biodiversity safeguards for Belt and Road Initiative’s financiers.Nature Sustainability,3(8). |
MLA | Narain D.,et al."Best-practice biodiversity safeguards for Belt and Road Initiative’s financiers".Nature Sustainability 3.8(2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。