气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Increasing decision relevance of ecosystem service science

CCPortal

DOI	10.1038/s41893-020-00625-y
	Increasing decision relevance of ecosystem service science
	Mandle L.; Shields-Estrada A.; Chaplin-Kramer R.; Mitchell M.G.E.; Bremer L.L.; Gourevitch J.D.; Hawthorne P.; Johnson J.A.; Robinson B.E.; Smith J.R.; Sonter L.J.; Verutes G.M.; Vogl A.L.; Daily G.C.; Ricketts T.H.
发表日期	2020
ISSN	2398-9629
英文摘要	The ecosystem service (ES) community aspires to illuminate how nature contributes to human well-being, and thereby elevate consideration of nature in decision making. So far, however, policy impact of ES research has been limited. To understand why, we identify five key elements of ES research that help inform decisions by connecting the supply of ES to those who benefit from them. Our structured review of the ES literature reveals that only 13% of assessments included the full ES chain from place to value. Only 7% of assessments considered the distribution of ES benefits explicitly across demographic or other beneficiary groups (for example, private landowners versus the broader public), although disaggregation across regions or spatial units was more common (44%). Finally, crucial mediating factors that affect who benefits and how (for example, the vulnerability of beneficiaries or the availability of substitutes for ES) were considered in only 35% of assessments. Our results suggest that increasing the decision relevance of ES research requires more effectively predicting the impacts of specific decisions on the value and distribution of ES across beneficiary groups. Such efforts will need to integrate ecological models with socioeconomic and cultural dimensions of ES more closely than does the current ES literature. © 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
语种	英语
scopus关键词	Decision making; Cultural dimensions; Disaggregation; Ecological models; Ecosystem services; Key elements; Private landowners; Structured review; Well being; Ecosystems
来源期刊	Nature Sustainability
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/163332
作者单位	Natural Capital Project, Department of Biology and Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States; Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Centre for Sustainable Food Systems, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; University of Hawaiʻi Economic Research Organization, Honolulu, HI, United States; University of Hawaiʻi Water Resources Research Center, Honolulu, HI, United States; Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States; Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States; Natural Capital Project, Institute on the Environment, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, United States; Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, Unite...
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Mandle L.,Shields-Estrada A.,Chaplin-Kramer R.,et al. Increasing decision relevance of ecosystem service science[J],2020.
APA	Mandle L..,Shields-Estrada A..,Chaplin-Kramer R..,Mitchell M.G.E..,Bremer L.L..,...&Ricketts T.H..(2020).Increasing decision relevance of ecosystem service science.Nature Sustainability.
MLA	Mandle L.,et al."Increasing decision relevance of ecosystem service science".Nature Sustainability (2020).