气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Beyond rationality in engineering design for sustainability

CCPortal

DOI	10.1038/s41893-018-0054-8
	Beyond rationality in engineering design for sustainability
	Klotz L.; Weber E.; Johnson E.; Shealy T.; Hernandez M.; Gordon B.
发表日期	2018
ISSN	2398-9629
起始页码	225
结束页码	233
卷号	1 期号:5
英文摘要	If you try to ensure long-term human well-being within the limits of the natural world, then you design for sustainability. This Review organizes research describing how cognitive biases can hinder and help engineering design for sustainability. For example, designers might overlook climate change implications because of nearsighted thinking, a bias which can be overcome by vividly imagining the future. For researchers, this Review illuminates needs at the convergence of decision science and engineering design. For designers (that is, all of us), the Review promises new routes to sustainability, through changes to decision environments and through insights into our own design thinking. © 2018 The Publisher.
语种	英语
scopus关键词	Climate change; Ecodesign; Cognitive bias; Decision environment; Design thinking; Engineering design; Natural world; Science and engineering; Well being; Sustainable development
来源期刊	Nature Sustainability
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/163286
作者单位	University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States; Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States; Columbia University, New York, NY, United States; Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Klotz L.,Weber E.,Johnson E.,et al. Beyond rationality in engineering design for sustainability[J],2018,1(5).
APA	Klotz L.,Weber E.,Johnson E.,Shealy T.,Hernandez M.,&Gordon B..(2018).Beyond rationality in engineering design for sustainability.Nature Sustainability,1(5).
MLA	Klotz L.,et al."Beyond rationality in engineering design for sustainability".Nature Sustainability 1.5(2018).