CCPortal
DOI10.1039/d0ee00725k
Techno-economic analysis of capacitive and intercalative water deionization
Metzger M.; Besli M.M.; Kuppan S.; Hellstrom S.; Kim S.; Sebti E.; Subban C.V.; Christensen J.
发表日期2020
ISSN1754-5692
起始页码1544
结束页码1560
卷号13期号:6
英文摘要We conduct a techno-economic analysis of electrochemical water deionization technologies. The objective of the analysis is to compare cost, volume, and energy consumption of membrane capacitive deionization (mCDI) to intercalative deionization techniques. Here, we first explore the concept of hybrid capacitive deionization (HCDI), i.e., a cation intercalation electrode paired with an activated carbon capacitive electrode. Then we explore in detail a novel device concept, fully intercalative water deionization (IDI), which relies entirely on the cation intercalation principle. The intercalation host materials in our study are Prussian blue analogs (PBAs), e.g., NiFe(CN)6 or CuFe(CN)6, that offer ∼3-5× higher gravimetric salt removal capacities than typical activated carbon. Our analysis shows that IDI should be superior to mCDI in module cost, volume, and energy efficiency, despite a more complex module architecture. Making careful assumptions on material costs, we provide a cost breakdown for mCDI, HCDI, and IDI modules and show that IDI is the only concept that is not dominated by ion exchange membrane costs. The environmental impact of electrochemical water deionization is illustrated by estimating the carbon footprint of currently installed reverse osmosis capacity in different world regions and comparing it to the respective carbon footprint of mCDI, HCDI, and IDI at similar capacity. © The Royal Society of Chemistry.
语种英语
scopus关键词Activated carbon; Carbon footprint; Copper compounds; Economic analysis; Electrodes; Emission control; Energy efficiency; Energy utilization; Ion exchange; Ion exchange membranes; Iron compounds; Nickel compounds; Positive ions; Salt removal; Capacitive deionization; Capacitive electrodes; Cation intercalation; Intercalation hosts; Membrane capacitive deionization; Module architecture; Prussian blue analogs; Techno-Economic analysis; Cost benefit analysis
来源期刊Energy and Environmental Science
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/162676
作者单位Robert Bosch LLC, Research and Technology Center, Sunnyvale, CA 94085, United States; Robert Bosch LLC, Research and Technology Center, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States; Energy Storage and Distributed Resources Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Metzger M.,Besli M.M.,Kuppan S.,et al. Techno-economic analysis of capacitive and intercalative water deionization[J],2020,13(6).
APA Metzger M..,Besli M.M..,Kuppan S..,Hellstrom S..,Kim S..,...&Christensen J..(2020).Techno-economic analysis of capacitive and intercalative water deionization.Energy and Environmental Science,13(6).
MLA Metzger M.,et al."Techno-economic analysis of capacitive and intercalative water deionization".Energy and Environmental Science 13.6(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Metzger M.]的文章
[Besli M.M.]的文章
[Kuppan S.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Metzger M.]的文章
[Besli M.M.]的文章
[Kuppan S.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Metzger M.]的文章
[Besli M.M.]的文章
[Kuppan S.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。