Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1039/d0ee00725k |
Techno-economic analysis of capacitive and intercalative water deionization | |
Metzger M.; Besli M.M.; Kuppan S.; Hellstrom S.; Kim S.; Sebti E.; Subban C.V.; Christensen J. | |
发表日期 | 2020 |
ISSN | 1754-5692 |
起始页码 | 1544 |
结束页码 | 1560 |
卷号 | 13期号:6 |
英文摘要 | We conduct a techno-economic analysis of electrochemical water deionization technologies. The objective of the analysis is to compare cost, volume, and energy consumption of membrane capacitive deionization (mCDI) to intercalative deionization techniques. Here, we first explore the concept of hybrid capacitive deionization (HCDI), i.e., a cation intercalation electrode paired with an activated carbon capacitive electrode. Then we explore in detail a novel device concept, fully intercalative water deionization (IDI), which relies entirely on the cation intercalation principle. The intercalation host materials in our study are Prussian blue analogs (PBAs), e.g., NiFe(CN)6 or CuFe(CN)6, that offer ∼3-5× higher gravimetric salt removal capacities than typical activated carbon. Our analysis shows that IDI should be superior to mCDI in module cost, volume, and energy efficiency, despite a more complex module architecture. Making careful assumptions on material costs, we provide a cost breakdown for mCDI, HCDI, and IDI modules and show that IDI is the only concept that is not dominated by ion exchange membrane costs. The environmental impact of electrochemical water deionization is illustrated by estimating the carbon footprint of currently installed reverse osmosis capacity in different world regions and comparing it to the respective carbon footprint of mCDI, HCDI, and IDI at similar capacity. © The Royal Society of Chemistry. |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Activated carbon; Carbon footprint; Copper compounds; Economic analysis; Electrodes; Emission control; Energy efficiency; Energy utilization; Ion exchange; Ion exchange membranes; Iron compounds; Nickel compounds; Positive ions; Salt removal; Capacitive deionization; Capacitive electrodes; Cation intercalation; Intercalation hosts; Membrane capacitive deionization; Module architecture; Prussian blue analogs; Techno-Economic analysis; Cost benefit analysis |
来源期刊 | Energy and Environmental Science
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/162676 |
作者单位 | Robert Bosch LLC, Research and Technology Center, Sunnyvale, CA 94085, United States; Robert Bosch LLC, Research and Technology Center, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States; Energy Storage and Distributed Resources Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Metzger M.,Besli M.M.,Kuppan S.,et al. Techno-economic analysis of capacitive and intercalative water deionization[J],2020,13(6). |
APA | Metzger M..,Besli M.M..,Kuppan S..,Hellstrom S..,Kim S..,...&Christensen J..(2020).Techno-economic analysis of capacitive and intercalative water deionization.Energy and Environmental Science,13(6). |
MLA | Metzger M.,et al."Techno-economic analysis of capacitive and intercalative water deionization".Energy and Environmental Science 13.6(2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。