气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Open science; communal culture; and women's participation in the movement to improve science

CCPortal

DOI	10.1073/pnas.1921320117
	Open science; communal culture; and women's participation in the movement to improve science
	Murphy M.C.; Mejia A.F.; Mejia J.; Yan X.; Cheryan S.; Dasgupta N.; Destin M.; Fryberg S.A.; Garcia J.A.; Haines E.L.; Harackiewicz J.M.; Ledgerwood A.; Moss-Racusin C.A.; Park L.E.; Perry S.P.; Ratliff K.A.; Rattan A.; Sanchez D.T.; Savani K.; Sekaquaptewa D.; Smith J.L.; Taylor V.J.; Thoman D.B.; Wout D.A.; Mabry P.L.; Ressl S.; Diekman A.B.; Pestilli F.
发表日期	2020
ISSN	0027-8424
起始页码	24154
结束页码	24164
卷号	117 期号:39
英文摘要	Science is undergoing rapid change with the movement to improve science focused largely on reproducibility/replicability and open science practices. This moment of change-in which science turns inward to examine its methods and practices-provides an opportunity to address its historic lack of diversity and noninclusive culture. Through network modeling and semantic analysis, we provide an initial exploration of the structure, cultural frames, and women's participation in the open science and reproducibility literatures (n = 2,926 articles and conference proceedings). Network analyses suggest that the open science and reproducibility literatures are emerging relatively independently of each other, sharing few common papers or authors. We next examine whether the literatures differentially incorporate collaborative, prosocial ideals that are known to engage members of underrepresented groups more than independent, winner-takes-all approaches. We find that open science has a more connected, collaborative structure than does reproducibility. Semantic analyses of paper abstracts reveal that these literatures have adopted different cultural frames: open science includes more explicitly communal and prosocial language than does reproducibility. Finally, consistent with literature suggesting the diversity benefits of communal and prosocial purposes, we find that women publish more frequently in high-status author positions (first or last) within open science (vs. reproducibility). Furthermore, this finding is further patterned by team size and time. Women are more represented in larger teams within reproducibility, and women's participation is increasing in open science over time and decreasing in reproducibility. We conclude with actionable suggestions for cultivating a more prosocial and diverse culture of science. © 2020 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
英文关键词	Culture; Open science; Replicability; Reproducibility; Women
语种	英语
scopus关键词	adult; article; female; human; human experiment; language; major clinical study; reproducibility; female; information dissemination; open access publishing; science; writing; Authorship; Humans; Information Dissemination; Open Access Publishing; Reproducibility of Results; Science; Women
来源期刊	Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/160792
作者单位	Murphy, M.C., Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Mejia, A.F., Department of Statistics, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47408, United States; Mejia, J., Kelley School of Business, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Yan, X., Network Science Institute, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47408, United States; Cheryan, S., Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States; Dasgupta, N., Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, United States; Destin, M., Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, United States, Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, United States, School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, United States; Fryberg, S.A., Department of Psychol...
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Murphy M.C.,Mejia A.F.,Mejia J.,et al. Open science; communal culture; and women's participation in the movement to improve science[J],2020,117(39).
APA	Murphy M.C..,Mejia A.F..,Mejia J..,Yan X..,Cheryan S..,...&Pestilli F..(2020).Open science; communal culture; and women's participation in the movement to improve science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,117(39).
MLA	Murphy M.C.,et al."Open science; communal culture; and women's participation in the movement to improve science".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117.39(2020).