CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118773
What are the impacts of the wood pellet industry on biodiversity in Southeastern USA? A systematic evidence synthesis
Petrokofsky G.; Hooper O.; Petrokofsky L.; Gant A.E.; Harvey W.J.; Willis K.J.
发表日期2020
ISSN0378-1127
英文摘要Forests in the southeastern USA have been actively managed for timber and other wood products for over 200 years. The wood pellet industry is relatively new and has generated polarised debate between those who want little or no active management of forests in the region, and those who point to the region's long history of sustainable forest management (broadly a debate between those seeking to protect nature from use and proponents of production forestry). Outside plantations grown for the purpose, the wood pellet industry claims to use thinnings and forest residues from final timber harvests (as well as sawmill residues), logging waste and material from forests harvested for timber. Claims that the industry uses material from the forest that would otherwise have no market and that this is a co-product of harvests that would happen in any case have been contested and assertions made about the damage the industry is doing to forests in the region. The academic literature on specific impacts of the wood pellet industry on the ecology of southeastern forests is sparse. In order to determine likely impacts of the industry, an assessment was made of the broader impacts of harvest and extraction techniques which remove residues generally. The impact of such forest management techniques on terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity has not been systematically assessed, despite the large volume of literature over several decades. A systematic synthesis of the literature was therefore conducted to create an evidence base of knowledge of relevance to future policy and practice. The synthesis followed best practice guidelines on conducting systematic synthesis. In addition to a searchable database of relevant research, an interactive cartographic map was produced which enables users to interrogate the evidence base according to criteria defined in the format of the evidence data sheets created for each study. In total 19,919 articles were assessed systematically, from which 211 studies were identified and analysed in detail. The majority of studies (145) in the evidence base report no negative impacts of forestry practices on biodiversity (i.e. 69% of the studies). The review covers in detail the subset of papers that do report negative impacts and these can also be filtered and interrogated separately on the systematic map. The analysis shows that within this small subset of studies, impacts appear to be greatest for land invertebrates (26% of all negative impacts, i.e. 8% of all studies). © 2020 Elsevier B.V.
英文关键词Biodiversity; Biofuel; Biomass; Forest management; Silvicultural practices; Southeastern USA; Systematic evidence synthesis; Systematic mapping; Wood pellets
语种英语
scopus关键词Biodiversity; Harvesting; Industrial management; Pelletizing; Timber; Wood products; Academic literature; Aquatic biodiversity; Best practice guidelines; Extraction techniques; Forestry practices; Management techniques; Searchable database; Sustainable forest management; Forestry
来源期刊Forest Ecology and Management
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/155629
作者单位Oxford Long-term Ecology Lab, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Systematic Reviews LLP, United Kingdom
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Petrokofsky G.,Hooper O.,Petrokofsky L.,et al. What are the impacts of the wood pellet industry on biodiversity in Southeastern USA? A systematic evidence synthesis[J],2020.
APA Petrokofsky G.,Hooper O.,Petrokofsky L.,Gant A.E.,Harvey W.J.,&Willis K.J..(2020).What are the impacts of the wood pellet industry on biodiversity in Southeastern USA? A systematic evidence synthesis.Forest Ecology and Management.
MLA Petrokofsky G.,et al."What are the impacts of the wood pellet industry on biodiversity in Southeastern USA? A systematic evidence synthesis".Forest Ecology and Management (2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Petrokofsky G.]的文章
[Hooper O.]的文章
[Petrokofsky L.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Petrokofsky G.]的文章
[Hooper O.]的文章
[Petrokofsky L.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Petrokofsky G.]的文章
[Hooper O.]的文章
[Petrokofsky L.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。