Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118085 |
Quantitative and qualitative approaches to assess tree vigor and stand health in dry pine forests | |
Grulke N.; Bienz C.; Hrinkevich K.; Maxfield J.; Uyeda K. | |
发表日期 | 2020 |
ISSN | 0378-1127 |
卷号 | 465 |
英文摘要 | Despite a critical need to evaluate effectiveness of forest treatments in improving stand health, practitioners lack quantitative, repeatable metrics to assess tree vigor and stand health. We evaluated canopy and whole tree attributes of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Dougl. Ex Laws) related to carbon balance, water balance, and susceptibility to insects and pathogens in dry, pine-dominated forest stands during a multi-year drought, an environmental challenge to stand resilience. Metrics of trees in two unmanaged, and seven treated forested stands, in both uplands and lowlands to develop the quantitative approach. Whole tree and crown attributes including needle length and color, branchlet length and diameter, needle retention (needle ages and retention within ages), and frequency of insects, fungi, and abiotic needle damage were statistically selected to assess tree vigor. Cluster analysis of vigor attributes revealed that trees responded or persisted independently within a forest treatment; forest treatments did not necessarily yield similar tree responses within a stand. A rapid, qualitative assessment was developed to rank trees as low, average, and above-average vigor. To demonstrate an application of our approach, trees were ranked annually over six years in most stands, as well as in a stand where the prescription was adjusted due to the evaluation. The proportion of trees in the three tree vigor ranks differed, suggesting differing levels of stand health. Quantitative metrics and qualitative ranking of tree vigor could assist in selecting trees to be retained to meet specific management objectives, to evaluate treatment implementation, and to monitor post-treatment changes in stand health. © 2020 |
英文关键词 | Dry pine forest; Forest restoration; Forest treatments; Monitoring; Ponderosa pine; Stand assessment; Stand health; Stand management; Stand resilience; Tree vigor |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Cluster analysis; Conservation; Environmental regulations; Health; Monitoring; Needles; Petroleum reservoir evaluation; Forest restoration; Forest treatment; Pine forest; Ponderosa pines; Stand management; Tree vigor; Forestry; assessment method; coniferous forest; coniferous tree; drought; forest canopy; forest ecosystem; forest management; insect; pathogen; qualitative analysis; quantitative analysis; stand structure; tree; Conservation; Environmental Regulations; Forestry; Health; Monitoring; Needles; Fungi; Hexapoda; Pinus ponderosa |
来源期刊 | Forest Ecology and Management |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/155304 |
作者单位 | USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 63095 Deschutes Market Rd, Bend, OR 97701, United States; The Nature Conservancy, 226 Pine Street, Klamath Falls, OR 97601, United States; DOE-ORISE, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States; Portland State University, Biology Department, Portland, OR 97207, United States; San Diego State University, Biology Department, San Diego, CA 92182, United States |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Grulke N.,Bienz C.,Hrinkevich K.,et al. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to assess tree vigor and stand health in dry pine forests[J],2020,465. |
APA | Grulke N.,Bienz C.,Hrinkevich K.,Maxfield J.,&Uyeda K..(2020).Quantitative and qualitative approaches to assess tree vigor and stand health in dry pine forests.Forest Ecology and Management,465. |
MLA | Grulke N.,et al."Quantitative and qualitative approaches to assess tree vigor and stand health in dry pine forests".Forest Ecology and Management 465(2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。