气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Payments for adding ecosystem carbon are mostly beneficial to biodiversity

CCPortal

DOI	10.1088/1748-9326/ab1554
	Payments for adding ecosystem carbon are mostly beneficial to biodiversity
	Larjavaara M.; Davenport T.R.B.; Gangga A.; Holm S.; Kanninen M.; Tien N.D.
发表日期	2019
ISSN	17489318
卷号	14 期号:5
英文摘要	Biodiversity conservation is often considered to be an important co-benefit of REDD+ and other mechanisms aiming to increase carbon in biomass and soil to mitigate climate change. This reasoning is based on the assumption that the level of biodiversity and ecosystem carbon are positively correlated. Firstly, however, studies have shown both positive and negative relationships. Secondly, incentives for additional ecosystem carbon do not trigger random or all potential changes in land-use, but often concentrate on one or a few specific changes that could have an opposite effect than the general trend indicates. Therefore, it is important to study biodiversity impacts of plausible measures to increase carbon. We obtained land-use scenarios on pathways to increase carbon based on 97 face-to-face interviews of local land-use experts in twelve landscapes in seven countries and five continents. We then conducted another set of face-to-face interviews with biodiversity experts yielding 2963 estimations concerning the value of land-use classes for 264 taxa of fauna and flora in these landscapes. We found positive carbon to biodiversity relationships in ten of the twelve landscapes. The biodiversity impacts of measures to increase carbon were positive in eleven of the twelve landscapes. Our results indicate that a random land-use change that increases biodiversity is also likely to increase carbon and vice versa. © 2019 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.
英文关键词	biodiversity; biomass; conservation; ecosystem carbon; payment for an ecosystem service; REDD; soil organic carbon
语种	英语
scopus关键词	Biodiversity; Biomass; Climate change; Conservation; Ecosystems; Land use; Soil conservation; Biodiversity conservation; Biomass and soils; Ecosystem carbons; Ecosystem services; Face-to-face interview; Land-use scenario; REDD; Soil organic carbon; Organic carbon; biodiversity; biomass; conservation status; ecosystem service; land use change; landscape; organic carbon; questionnaire survey; soil carbon
来源期刊	Environmental Research Letters
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/154598
作者单位	Institute of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China; Viikki Tropical Resources Institute (VITRI), Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, PO Box 27, Helsinki, 00014, Finland; Wildlife Conservation Society, PO Box 922, Zanzibar, Tanzania; Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia; University of Florida, Gainesville, United States; Faculty of Development Economics, University of Economics and Business, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Viet Nam
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Larjavaara M.,Davenport T.R.B.,Gangga A.,et al. Payments for adding ecosystem carbon are mostly beneficial to biodiversity[J],2019,14(5).
APA	Larjavaara M.,Davenport T.R.B.,Gangga A.,Holm S.,Kanninen M.,&Tien N.D..(2019).Payments for adding ecosystem carbon are mostly beneficial to biodiversity.Environmental Research Letters,14(5).
MLA	Larjavaara M.,et al."Payments for adding ecosystem carbon are mostly beneficial to biodiversity".Environmental Research Letters 14.5(2019).