气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Fair ways to share benefits from community forests? How commodification is associated with reduced preference for equality and poverty alleviation

CCPortal

DOI	10.1088/1748-9326/ab114f
	Fair ways to share benefits from community forests? How commodification is associated with reduced preference for equality and poverty alleviation
	Martin A.; Kebede B.; Gross-Camp N.; He J.; Inturias M.; Rodríguez I.
发表日期	2019
ISSN	17489318
卷号	14 期号:6
英文摘要	This research is concerned with the trend towards commodification of forestry, in the context of community forest governance for sustainable development in the tropics. In these contexts, commodification takes different forms, including sales of certified timbers and sales of carbon credits. In addition to the general aim to enhance income, these market-based forestry interventions typically aim to align with sustainable development agendas, including (a) safeguarding ecological integrity and (b) promoting poverty alleviation. Our concern here is that the process of forest commodification might lead to a shift in local norms of benefit-sharing, in ways that can hinder these key components of sustainable development goals. We report the results of a survey (N = 519) conducted across sites in Bolivia, China and Tanzania that shows that switching from non-monetary to monetary benefits is associated with changes in preferences for distributional fairness in ways that may be detrimental to the poor. In particular, we show that forest commodification is associated with a lower likelihood of selecting pro-poor or egalitarian approaches to benefit sharing and higher likelihood of selecting to distribute benefits in a way that rewards individual contributions or compensates losses. © 2019 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.
英文关键词	benefit sharing; commodification; community forests; distributive fairness; environmental justice; Payments for ecosystem services; sustainable development goals
语种	英语
scopus关键词	Ecosystems; Forestry; Planning; Timber; Benefit sharing; commodification; Community forest; distributive fairness; Environmental justice; Payments for ecosystem services; Sustainable development
来源期刊	Environmental Research Letters
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/154569
作者单位	University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom; Allegheny College, Meadville, PA, United States; Yunnan University, Kunming, China; NUR University, Santa Cruz, Bolivia, Bolivia
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Martin A.,Kebede B.,Gross-Camp N.,et al. Fair ways to share benefits from community forests? How commodification is associated with reduced preference for equality and poverty alleviation[J],2019,14(6).
APA	Martin A.,Kebede B.,Gross-Camp N.,He J.,Inturias M.,&Rodríguez I..(2019).Fair ways to share benefits from community forests? How commodification is associated with reduced preference for equality and poverty alleviation.Environmental Research Letters,14(6).
MLA	Martin A.,et al."Fair ways to share benefits from community forests? How commodification is associated with reduced preference for equality and poverty alleviation".Environmental Research Letters 14.6(2019).