Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/ab5cae |
Quantifying the return on investment of social and ecological data for conservation planning | |
Field C.R.; Elphick C.S. | |
发表日期 | 2019 |
ISSN | 17489318 |
卷号 | 14期号:12 |
英文摘要 | The interdisciplinary nature of conservation problems is increasingly being incorporated into research, raising fundamental questions about the relative importance of the different types of knowledge and data. Although there has been extensive research on the development of methods and tools for conservation planning, especially spatial planning, comparatively little is known about the relative importance of ecological versus non-ecological data for prioritization, or the likely return on investment of incorporating better data. We demonstrate a simple approach for (1) quantifying the sensitivity of spatial planning results to different ecological and non-ecological data layers, and (2) estimating the potential gains in efficiency from incorporating additional data. Our case study involves spatial planning for coastal squeeze, a process by which development blocks coastal ecosystems from moving landward in response to sea-level rise. We show that incorporating spatial data on landowners' likelihood of selling had little effect on identifying relative priorities but drastically changed the outlook for whether conservation goals could be achieved. Better data on the costs of conservation actions had the greatest potential to improve the efficiency of spatial planning, in some cases generating more than an order of magnitude greater cost savings compared to ecological data. Our framework could be applied to other systems to guide the development of spatial planning and to identify general rules of thumb for the importance of alternative data sources for conservation problems in different socio-ecological contexts. © 2019 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. |
英文关键词 | Coastal conservation; Conservation costs; Decision support; Interdisciplinary science; Spatial prioritization; Systematic planning |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Conservation; Decision support systems; Ecosystems; Efficiency; Profitability; Sea level; Conservation costs; Decision supports; Interdisciplinary science; Spatial prioritization; Systematic planning; Investments; action plan; coastal zone; conservation planning; decision support system; interdisciplinary approach; investment; nature conservation; prioritization; quantitative analysis; spatial planning |
来源期刊 | Environmental Research Letters
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/154231 |
作者单位 | National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC), University of Maryland, 1 Park Place, Annapolis, MD 21401, United States; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Center of Biological Risk, University of Connecticut, 75 North Eagleville Road, U-43, Storrs, MD CT 06269, United States |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Field C.R.,Elphick C.S.. Quantifying the return on investment of social and ecological data for conservation planning[J],2019,14(12). |
APA | Field C.R.,&Elphick C.S..(2019).Quantifying the return on investment of social and ecological data for conservation planning.Environmental Research Letters,14(12). |
MLA | Field C.R.,et al."Quantifying the return on investment of social and ecological data for conservation planning".Environmental Research Letters 14.12(2019). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Field C.R.]的文章 |
[Elphick C.S.]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Field C.R.]的文章 |
[Elphick C.S.]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Field C.R.]的文章 |
[Elphick C.S.]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。