CCPortal
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ab6394
What is important for achieving 2 °c? UNFCCC and IPCC expert perceptions on obstacles and response options for climate change mitigation
Kornek U.; Flachsland C.; Kardish C.; Levi S.; Edenhofer O.
发表日期2020
ISSN17489318
卷号15期号:2
英文摘要Global mitigation efforts remain insufficient to limit the global temperature increase to well below 2 °C. While a growing academic literature analyzes this problem, perceptions of which obstacles inhibit goal attainment and which responses might be most effective seem to differ widely. This makes prioritization and agreement on the way forward difficult. To inform prioritization in global climate policy and research agendas, we present quantitative data on how 917 experts from the IPCC and the UNFCCC perceive the importance of different obstacles and response options for achieving 2 °C. On average, respondents consider opposition from special interest groups the most important obstacle and technological R&D the most important response. Our survey also finds that the majority of experts perceives a wide range of issues as important, supporting an agenda that is inclusive in terms of coverage. Average importance ratings differ between experts from the Global North and South, suggesting that balanced representation in global fora and regionally differentiated agendas are important. In particular, opposition from special interest groups is a top priority among experts from North America, Europe and Oceania. Investigating the drivers of individual importance ratings, we find little difference between experts from the IPCC and the UNFCCC, while expert's perceptions correlate with their academic training and their national scientific, regulatory, and financial contexts. © 2020 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.
英文关键词agenda setting; climate change mitigation; expert elicitation; obstacles and responses
语种英语
scopus关键词Environmental engineering; Research; Academic literature; Agenda settings; Climate change mitigation; Expert elicitation; Global temperatures; obstacles and responses; Quantitative data; Special interest groups; Climate change; climate change; environmental policy; expert system; global change; global climate; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; international agreement; mitigation; perception; prioritization; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Europe; North America; oceanic regions
来源期刊Environmental Research Letters
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/154117
作者单位Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Torgauer Straße 12-15, Berlin, D-10829, Germany; Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Telegraphenberg A 31, Potsdam, D-14473, Germany; Hertie School of Governance, Friedrichstraße 180, Berlin, D-10117, Germany; Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, Berlin, D-10623, Germany
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Kornek U.,Flachsland C.,Kardish C.,et al. What is important for achieving 2 °c? UNFCCC and IPCC expert perceptions on obstacles and response options for climate change mitigation[J],2020,15(2).
APA Kornek U.,Flachsland C.,Kardish C.,Levi S.,&Edenhofer O..(2020).What is important for achieving 2 °c? UNFCCC and IPCC expert perceptions on obstacles and response options for climate change mitigation.Environmental Research Letters,15(2).
MLA Kornek U.,et al."What is important for achieving 2 °c? UNFCCC and IPCC expert perceptions on obstacles and response options for climate change mitigation".Environmental Research Letters 15.2(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Kornek U.]的文章
[Flachsland C.]的文章
[Kardish C.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Kornek U.]的文章
[Flachsland C.]的文章
[Kardish C.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Kornek U.]的文章
[Flachsland C.]的文章
[Kardish C.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。