Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6394 |
What is important for achieving 2 °c? UNFCCC and IPCC expert perceptions on obstacles and response options for climate change mitigation | |
Kornek U.; Flachsland C.; Kardish C.; Levi S.; Edenhofer O. | |
发表日期 | 2020 |
ISSN | 17489318 |
卷号 | 15期号:2 |
英文摘要 | Global mitigation efforts remain insufficient to limit the global temperature increase to well below 2 °C. While a growing academic literature analyzes this problem, perceptions of which obstacles inhibit goal attainment and which responses might be most effective seem to differ widely. This makes prioritization and agreement on the way forward difficult. To inform prioritization in global climate policy and research agendas, we present quantitative data on how 917 experts from the IPCC and the UNFCCC perceive the importance of different obstacles and response options for achieving 2 °C. On average, respondents consider opposition from special interest groups the most important obstacle and technological R&D the most important response. Our survey also finds that the majority of experts perceives a wide range of issues as important, supporting an agenda that is inclusive in terms of coverage. Average importance ratings differ between experts from the Global North and South, suggesting that balanced representation in global fora and regionally differentiated agendas are important. In particular, opposition from special interest groups is a top priority among experts from North America, Europe and Oceania. Investigating the drivers of individual importance ratings, we find little difference between experts from the IPCC and the UNFCCC, while expert's perceptions correlate with their academic training and their national scientific, regulatory, and financial contexts. © 2020 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. |
英文关键词 | agenda setting; climate change mitigation; expert elicitation; obstacles and responses |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Environmental engineering; Research; Academic literature; Agenda settings; Climate change mitigation; Expert elicitation; Global temperatures; obstacles and responses; Quantitative data; Special interest groups; Climate change; climate change; environmental policy; expert system; global change; global climate; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; international agreement; mitigation; perception; prioritization; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Europe; North America; oceanic regions |
来源期刊 | Environmental Research Letters
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/154117 |
作者单位 | Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Torgauer Straße 12-15, Berlin, D-10829, Germany; Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Telegraphenberg A 31, Potsdam, D-14473, Germany; Hertie School of Governance, Friedrichstraße 180, Berlin, D-10117, Germany; Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, Berlin, D-10623, Germany |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Kornek U.,Flachsland C.,Kardish C.,et al. What is important for achieving 2 °c? UNFCCC and IPCC expert perceptions on obstacles and response options for climate change mitigation[J],2020,15(2). |
APA | Kornek U.,Flachsland C.,Kardish C.,Levi S.,&Edenhofer O..(2020).What is important for achieving 2 °c? UNFCCC and IPCC expert perceptions on obstacles and response options for climate change mitigation.Environmental Research Letters,15(2). |
MLA | Kornek U.,et al."What is important for achieving 2 °c? UNFCCC and IPCC expert perceptions on obstacles and response options for climate change mitigation".Environmental Research Letters 15.2(2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。