CCPortal
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/abb55e
Toward eliminating children's lead exposure: A comparison of policies and their outcomes in three lead producing and using countries
Sullivan M.; Green D.
发表日期2020
ISSN17489318
卷号15期号:10
英文摘要Though the problem of childhood lead poisoning has been recognized for more than a century, it remains an important threat to children's health and development. This comparative policy assessment examines and compares environmental and public health policies to prevent children's exposure of three major lead producing countries. Germany, the USA and Australia were used to explore a range of approaches primarily at the national level to identify best practice, how the lack of finding any 'safe exposure' level has been incorporated into policy, and to consider if any international harmonization has occurred. We searched the peer-reviewed literature, government websites, policy documents and grey literature to identify how and when policies were developed, implemented and revised. From this analysis, we present a chronology and discussion of national policy approaches for the main sources of lead exposure for children in each country. We found significant differences in timing and comprehensiveness of environmental policies related to lead. There are significant differences among the countries in biomonitoring and identifying pathways of exposure, with limited information available in Germany and Australia. Though there are significant gaps, the US has the most comprehensive regulations relating to old lead paint in housing, while in Australia, a regulatory framework is lacking. Though all three countries regulate lead in air, the US has the most health protective standard, while Australia lacks the ability to ensure that states meet the national standard. Though each country has developed regulatory frameworks for lead that have reduced children's exposure, none of the three countries have a comprehensive set of policies that respond to the scientific evidence that there is no identified threshold for lead exposure. While there are differences in the relative importance of lead exposure pathways among the three countries, suggesting the need for different prevention emphases, there is also a strong argument for more international harmonization of exposure standards at the most protective levels. Some environmental policies incorporate current scientific understanding of lead toxicity, however, we identified gaps in standards and enforcement, and as a result, exposure continues to affect the health of children in all three countries. © 2020 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.
英文关键词Australia; BLL; childhood lead exposure; comparative policy; Germany; lead; USA
语种英语
scopus关键词Health; Health risks; Laws and legislation; Painting; Environmental policy; Exposure standards; Government websites; International harmonization; Limited information; Public health policies; Regulatory frameworks; Scientific evidence; Environmental protection
来源期刊Environmental Research Letters
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/153568
作者单位Department of Public Health, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ, United States; Climate Change Research Centre, Arc Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Sullivan M.,Green D.. Toward eliminating children's lead exposure: A comparison of policies and their outcomes in three lead producing and using countries[J],2020,15(10).
APA Sullivan M.,&Green D..(2020).Toward eliminating children's lead exposure: A comparison of policies and their outcomes in three lead producing and using countries.Environmental Research Letters,15(10).
MLA Sullivan M.,et al."Toward eliminating children's lead exposure: A comparison of policies and their outcomes in three lead producing and using countries".Environmental Research Letters 15.10(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Sullivan M.]的文章
[Green D.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Sullivan M.]的文章
[Green D.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Sullivan M.]的文章
[Green D.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。