CCPortal
DOI10.1080/14693062.2019.1627180
Would different methodologies for assessing carbon leakage exposure lead to different risk levels? A case study of the Brazilian industry
Santos L.; Lucena A.F.P.; Garaffa R.
发表日期2019
ISSN14693062
起始页码1102
结束页码1116
卷号19期号:9
英文摘要Energy-intensive industries play an important role in low-carbon development, being particularly exposed to climate policies. Concern over possible carbon leakage in this sector poses a major challenge for designing effective carbon pricing instruments (CPI). Different methodologies for assessing carbon leakage exposure are currently used by different jurisdictions, each of them based on different approaches and indicators. This paper aims to analyse the extent to which the use of different methodologies leads to different results in terms of exposure to the risk of carbon leakage, using the Brazilian industry sector as a case study. Results indicate that carbon leakage exposure is an expected outcome of eventual CPI implementation in Brazilian industry. However, results vary according to the chosen methodology, so the definition of the criteria is paramount for assessing sectoral exposure to the risk of carbon leakage. Key policy insights Despite increasing discussion about the implementation of carbon pricing on the Brazilian industrial sector, the evaluation of carbon leakage risks is still neglected. Assessments of the risk of carbon leakage are directly related to the indicators and criteria used by each methodology. Thus, a given subsector may present different levels of exposure to carbon leakage depending on the methodological choice. More than a purely technical discussion, the methodological definition of carbon leakage risk is a political discussion–it can be well-conducted, leading to the success of a CPI, or even sabotaged, by implicitly subsidizing energy-intensive industries. © 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
英文关键词Brazilian industry; carbon cost; carbon leakage; Carbon pricing; emissions intensity; trade intensity
语种英语
scopus关键词carbon emission; emission control; emissions trading; industrial emission; pollution tax; risk assessment; Brazil
来源期刊Climate Policy
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/153456
作者单位Industrial Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Macaé, Brazil; Energy Planning Program, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Santos L.,Lucena A.F.P.,Garaffa R.. Would different methodologies for assessing carbon leakage exposure lead to different risk levels? A case study of the Brazilian industry[J],2019,19(9).
APA Santos L.,Lucena A.F.P.,&Garaffa R..(2019).Would different methodologies for assessing carbon leakage exposure lead to different risk levels? A case study of the Brazilian industry.Climate Policy,19(9).
MLA Santos L.,et al."Would different methodologies for assessing carbon leakage exposure lead to different risk levels? A case study of the Brazilian industry".Climate Policy 19.9(2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Santos L.]的文章
[Lucena A.F.P.]的文章
[Garaffa R.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Santos L.]的文章
[Lucena A.F.P.]的文章
[Garaffa R.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Santos L.]的文章
[Lucena A.F.P.]的文章
[Garaffa R.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。