Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1080/14693062.2019.1627180 |
Would different methodologies for assessing carbon leakage exposure lead to different risk levels? A case study of the Brazilian industry | |
Santos L.; Lucena A.F.P.; Garaffa R. | |
发表日期 | 2019 |
ISSN | 14693062 |
起始页码 | 1102 |
结束页码 | 1116 |
卷号 | 19期号:9 |
英文摘要 | Energy-intensive industries play an important role in low-carbon development, being particularly exposed to climate policies. Concern over possible carbon leakage in this sector poses a major challenge for designing effective carbon pricing instruments (CPI). Different methodologies for assessing carbon leakage exposure are currently used by different jurisdictions, each of them based on different approaches and indicators. This paper aims to analyse the extent to which the use of different methodologies leads to different results in terms of exposure to the risk of carbon leakage, using the Brazilian industry sector as a case study. Results indicate that carbon leakage exposure is an expected outcome of eventual CPI implementation in Brazilian industry. However, results vary according to the chosen methodology, so the definition of the criteria is paramount for assessing sectoral exposure to the risk of carbon leakage. Key policy insights Despite increasing discussion about the implementation of carbon pricing on the Brazilian industrial sector, the evaluation of carbon leakage risks is still neglected. Assessments of the risk of carbon leakage are directly related to the indicators and criteria used by each methodology. Thus, a given subsector may present different levels of exposure to carbon leakage depending on the methodological choice. More than a purely technical discussion, the methodological definition of carbon leakage risk is a political discussion–it can be well-conducted, leading to the success of a CPI, or even sabotaged, by implicitly subsidizing energy-intensive industries. © 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. |
英文关键词 | Brazilian industry; carbon cost; carbon leakage; Carbon pricing; emissions intensity; trade intensity |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | carbon emission; emission control; emissions trading; industrial emission; pollution tax; risk assessment; Brazil |
来源期刊 | Climate Policy
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/153456 |
作者单位 | Industrial Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Macaé, Brazil; Energy Planning Program, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Santos L.,Lucena A.F.P.,Garaffa R.. Would different methodologies for assessing carbon leakage exposure lead to different risk levels? A case study of the Brazilian industry[J],2019,19(9). |
APA | Santos L.,Lucena A.F.P.,&Garaffa R..(2019).Would different methodologies for assessing carbon leakage exposure lead to different risk levels? A case study of the Brazilian industry.Climate Policy,19(9). |
MLA | Santos L.,et al."Would different methodologies for assessing carbon leakage exposure lead to different risk levels? A case study of the Brazilian industry".Climate Policy 19.9(2019). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。