Climate Change Data Portal
| DOI | 10.1080/14693062.2018.1497938 |
| Democracy, electoral systems and emissions: explaining when and why democratization promotes mitigation | |
| Clulow Z. | |
| 发表日期 | 2019 |
| ISSN | 14693062 |
| 起始页码 | 244 |
| 结束页码 | 257 |
| 卷号 | 19期号:2 |
| 英文摘要 | Does democratization help countries mitigate climate change? On the one hand, by increasing the value placed on quality of life, creating more opportunity for environmental actors to influence policymaking and holding elected politicians accountable, an increase in democratic institution and process should promote emissions reduction. On the other hand, the desire to safeguard individual freedom presumably brings with it an aversion to intervene in lifestyle and market decisions, thereby raising the risk of climate inaction. This outcome is further encouraged by the political need to balance (conflicting) environmental and energy interests. This article evaluates the thesis that democratization promotes mitigation in light of national emissions levels from 1990 to 2012. Using data from the Freedom House, Polity IV and V-Dem indices, World Bank World Development Indicators and the World Resources Institute Climate Data Explorer it conducts a large-N investigation of the emissions levels of 147 countries. Although several quantitative studies have found that domestic political regimes affect emissions levels, this article goes beyond existing research by building a more sophisticated–multilevel- research design to determine whether democracy: (a) continues to be an important driver of emissions when country-level clustering is accounted for and (b) has uniform effects across countries. The results indicate that, even after controlling for country-level clustering and holding constant the other confounding factors, democracy is indeed a significant driver. More strikingly, they reveal that while democracies tend to have lower emissions than non-democracies, democratization spells within the same country do not have the same kind of inhibitory effects as they do between countries. This article also finds tentative evidence that the type of electoral system plays a critical role in shaping the effect of democratization on individual countries. Key policy insights Democracies tend to perform better in terms of emission levels than non-democracies. Democratization has non-uniform effects across different countries, with the type of electoral system playing a key role in determining the effect that democratization has on national emissions. Further research is needed to develop our understanding of how the political context influences emissions, especially with regard to the influence of pro and anti-decarbonisation actors. © 2018, © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. |
| 英文关键词 | CO2 emissions; electoral system; Emission projections; least developed countries (LDCs); mitigative capacity; political processes |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| scopus关键词 | carbon emission; democracy; democratization; developing world; electoral system; emission control; environmental politics; institutional framework |
| 来源期刊 | Climate Policy
 |
| 文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/153428 |
| 作者单位 | Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Clulow Z.. Democracy, electoral systems and emissions: explaining when and why democratization promotes mitigation[J],2019,19(2). |
| APA | Clulow Z..(2019).Democracy, electoral systems and emissions: explaining when and why democratization promotes mitigation.Climate Policy,19(2). |
| MLA | Clulow Z.."Democracy, electoral systems and emissions: explaining when and why democratization promotes mitigation".Climate Policy 19.2(2019). |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Clulow Z.]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Clulow Z.]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Clulow Z.]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
