气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): What drives policy change for REDD+? A qualitative comparative analysis of the interplay between institutional and policy arena factors

CCPortal

DOI	10.1080/14693062.2018.1507897
	What drives policy change for REDD+? A qualitative comparative analysis of the interplay between institutional and policy arena factors
	Korhonen-Kurki K.; Brockhaus M.; Sehring J.; Di Gregorio M.; Assembe-Mvondo S.; Babon A.; Bekele M.; Benn V.; Gebara M.F.; Kambire H.W.; Kengoum F.; Maharani C.; Menton M.; Moeliono M.; Ochieng R.; Paudel N.S.; Pham T.T.; Dkamela G.P.; Sitoe A.
发表日期	2019
ISSN	14693062
起始页码	315
结束页码	328
卷号	19 期号:3
英文摘要	Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) has emerged as a promising climate change mitigation mechanism in developing countries. In order to identify the enabling conditions for achieving progress in the implementation of an effective, efficient and equitable REDD+, this paper examines national policy settings in a comparative analysis across 13 countries with a focus on both institutional context and the actual setting of the policy arena. The evaluation of REDD+ revealed that countries across Africa, Asia and Latin America are showing some progress, but some face backlashes in realizing the necessary transformational change to tackle deforestation and forest degradation. A Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) undertaken as part of the research project showed two enabling institutional configurations facilitating progress: (1) the presence of already initiated policy change; and (2) scarcity of forest resources combined with an absence of any effective forestry framework and policies. When these were analysed alongside policy arena conditions, the paper finds that the presence of powerful transformational coalitions combined with strong ownership and leadership, and performance-based funding, can both work as a strong incentive for achieving REDD+ goals. Key policy insights The positive push of already existing policy change, or the negative stress of resource scarcity together with lack of effective policies, represents institutional conditions that can support REDD+ progress. Progress also requires the presence of powerful transformational coalitions and strong ownership and leadership. In the absence of these internal drivers, performance-based funding can work as a strong incentive. When comparing three assessments (2012, 2014, 2016) of REDD+ enabling conditions, some progress in establishing processes of change can be observed over time; however, the overall fluctuation in progress of most countries reveals the difficulty in changing the deforestation trajectory away from business as usual. © 2018, © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
英文关键词	climate change mitigation; developing countries; Policy change; QCA; REDD
语种	英语
scopus关键词	climate change; comparative study; deforestation; developing world; institutional framework; mitigation; qualitative analysis; Africa; Asia; Latin America
来源期刊	Climate Policy
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/153425
作者单位	CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia; Helsinki University Centre for Environment, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Delft, Netherlands; School of Earth and Environment, Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Central Africa Forest Commission (COMIFAC), Yaounde, Cameroon; Institute of Human Security and Social Change, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Wondo Genet College of Forestry and Natural Resources, Wondo Genet, Ethiopia; Iwokrama, Kingston Georgetown, Guyana; ForestAction Nepal, Patan, Nepal; Solutions and Evidence for Environment and Development (SEED), Oxford, United Kingdom; Environmental Humanities South (EHS), Department of Sociology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Center for Agriculture and Natural Resource Studies (CEAGRE), Faculty of Agronomy and Forestry, Eduardo Mondlane University of Maputo, Maputo, Mozambique
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Korhonen-Kurki K.,Brockhaus M.,Sehring J.,et al. What drives policy change for REDD+? A qualitative comparative analysis of the interplay between institutional and policy arena factors[J],2019,19(3).
APA	Korhonen-Kurki K..,Brockhaus M..,Sehring J..,Di Gregorio M..,Assembe-Mvondo S..,...&Sitoe A..(2019).What drives policy change for REDD+? A qualitative comparative analysis of the interplay between institutional and policy arena factors.Climate Policy,19(3).
MLA	Korhonen-Kurki K.,et al."What drives policy change for REDD+? A qualitative comparative analysis of the interplay between institutional and policy arena factors".Climate Policy 19.3(2019).