CCPortal
DOI10.1080/14693062.2018.1562871
International and national climate policies for aviation: a review
Larsson J.; Elofsson A.; Sterner T.; Åkerman J.
发表日期2019
ISSN14693062
起始页码787
结束页码799
卷号19期号:6
英文摘要Aviation constitutes about 2.5% of all energy-related CO 2 emissions and in addition there are non-CO 2 effects. In 2016, the ICAO decided to implement a Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) and in 2017 the EU decided on faster emission reductions in its Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), which since 2012 includes the aviation sector. The effects of these policies on the expected development of air travel emissions from 2017 to 2030 have been analyzed. For the sample country Sweden, the analysis shows that when emissions reductions in other sectors are attributed to the aviation sector as a result of the EU ETS and CORSIA, carbon emissions are expected to reduce by −0.8% per year (however if non-CO 2 emissions are included in the analysis, then emissions will increase). This is much less than what is needed to achieve the 2°C target. Our analysis of potential national aviation policy instruments shows that there are legally feasible options that could mitigate emissions in addition to the EU ETS and CORSIA. Distance-based air passenger taxes are common among EU Member States and through increased ticket prices these taxes can reduce demand for air travel and thus reduce emissions. Tax on jet fuel is an option for domestic aviation and for international aviation if bilateral agreements are concluded. A quota obligation for biofuels is a third option. Key policy insights Existing international climate policies for aviation will not deliver any major emission reductions. Policymakers who want to significantly push the aviation sector to contribute to meeting the 2°C target need to work towards putting in place tougher international policy instruments in the long term, and simultaneously implement temporary national policy instruments in the near-term. Distance-based air passenger taxes, carbon taxes on jet fuel and quota obligations for biofuels are available national policy options; if they are gradually increased, and harmonized with other countries, they can help to significantly reduce emissions. © 2019, © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
英文关键词Aviation emissions; biofuels; carbon credits; carbon tax; policy instruments
语种英语
来源期刊Climate Policy
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/153395
作者单位Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Strategic Sustainability Studies, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Larsson J.,Elofsson A.,Sterner T.,et al. International and national climate policies for aviation: a review[J],2019,19(6).
APA Larsson J.,Elofsson A.,Sterner T.,&Åkerman J..(2019).International and national climate policies for aviation: a review.Climate Policy,19(6).
MLA Larsson J.,et al."International and national climate policies for aviation: a review".Climate Policy 19.6(2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Larsson J.]的文章
[Elofsson A.]的文章
[Sterner T.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Larsson J.]的文章
[Elofsson A.]的文章
[Sterner T.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Larsson J.]的文章
[Elofsson A.]的文章
[Sterner T.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。