CCPortal
DOI10.1080/14693062.2019.1624494
Catalyzing mitigation ambition under the Paris Agreement: elements for an effective Global Stocktake
Hermwille L.; Siemons A.; Förster H.; Jeffery L.
发表日期2019
ISSN14693062
起始页码988
结束页码1001
卷号19期号:8
英文摘要The Global Stocktake (GST) takes a central role within the architecture of the Paris Agreement, with many hoping that it will become a catalyst for increased mitigation ambition. This paper outlines four governance functions for an ideal GST: pacemaker, ensurer of accountability, driver of ambition and provider of guidance and signal. The GST can set the pace of progress by stimulating and synchronizing policy processes across governance levels. It can ensure accountability of Parties through transparency and public information sharing. Ambition can be enhanced through benchmarks for action and transformative learning. By reiterating and refining the long term visions, it can echo and amplify the guidance and signal provided by the Paris Agreement. The paper further outlines preconditions for the effective performance of these functions. Process-related conditions include: a public appraisal of inputs; a facilitative format that can develop specific recommendations; high-level endorsement to amplify the message and effectively inform national climate policy agendas; and an appropriate schedule, especially with respect to the transparency framework. Underlying information provided by Parties complemented with other (scientific) sources needs to enable benchmark setting for collective climate action, to allow for transparent assessments of the state of emissions and progress of a low-carbon transformation. The information also needs to be politically relevant and concrete enough to trigger enhancement of ambition. We conclude that meeting these conditions would enable an ideal GST and maximize its catalytic effect. Key policy insights The functional argument developed in this article may inspire a purposeful design of the GST as its modalities and procedures are currently being negotiated. The analytical framework provided serves as a benchmark against which to assess the GST's modalities and procedures. Gaps and blind spots in the official GST can and should be addressed by processes external to the climate regime in academia and civil society. © 2019, © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
英文关键词Global Stocktake; mitigation; NDCs; Paris Agreement; raising ambition; UNFCCC
语种英语
scopus关键词analytical framework; benchmarking; collective action; environmental policy; governance approach; learning; mitigation; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
来源期刊Climate Policy
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/153371
作者单位Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Wuppertal, Germany; Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Öko-Institut e.V., Darmstadt, Germany; Öko-Institut e.V., Berlin, Germany; Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, Potsdam, Germany
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Hermwille L.,Siemons A.,Förster H.,et al. Catalyzing mitigation ambition under the Paris Agreement: elements for an effective Global Stocktake[J],2019,19(8).
APA Hermwille L.,Siemons A.,Förster H.,&Jeffery L..(2019).Catalyzing mitigation ambition under the Paris Agreement: elements for an effective Global Stocktake.Climate Policy,19(8).
MLA Hermwille L.,et al."Catalyzing mitigation ambition under the Paris Agreement: elements for an effective Global Stocktake".Climate Policy 19.8(2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Hermwille L.]的文章
[Siemons A.]的文章
[Förster H.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Hermwille L.]的文章
[Siemons A.]的文章
[Förster H.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Hermwille L.]的文章
[Siemons A.]的文章
[Förster H.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。