CCPortal
DOI10.1080/14693062.2020.1750334
Curbing the car: the mitigation potential of a higher carbon price in the New Zealand transport sector
Hasan M.A.; Frame D.J.; Chapman R.; Archie K.M.
发表日期2020
ISSN14693062
起始页码563
结束页码576
卷号20期号:5
英文摘要Carbon dioxide emissions from New Zealand’s transport sector have experienced rapid growth since 1990. In this paper, we investigate the scope for a targeted price signal to curb emissions growth and help deliver on the country’s Paris Agreement pledges. Cost burdens on various income groups are investigated, and experts’ opinions are elicited to evaluate two types of carbon price policies (i.e. a carbon tax and an increase in the current ETS price). We use two methodological approaches in this paper. Estimates of the social cost of carbon and the price elasticity of fuel demand are used to understand the mitigation potential of a higher carbon price, while a multi-criteria analysis technique is used to understand experts’ preferences between an ETS and a carbon tax. The findings are that with a price elasticity of transport fuel demand of around −0.7, a carbon price between NZD 100 (USD 65) per tonne of carbon dioxide (tCO2) and NZD 235 (USD 153)/tCO2 could reduce transport emissions by between 33% and 44% in 2030, respectively, from the 2016 level. The (uncompensated) cost-burdens on lower income households due to a hypothetical price of NZD 100/tCO2 and NZD 235/tCO2 are estimated to be around NZD 531 (USD 345)/year and NZD 670 (USD 436)/year per household respectively. Experts marginally favoured a carbon tax over an ETS because the revenue collected through a carbon tax could be utilized in a more holistic way to offset the tax burden on lower income households and fund emissions reduction technologies and infrastructures. Key policy insights A carbon price of NZD 235 (USD 153)/tCO2 implying a fuel price of NZD 3/litre (USD 1.95/litre) could reduce transport emissions by 44% in 2030 from the 2016 level. A fuel price of NZD 3/litre is comparable to fuel prices in the early 1980s, when these were at a historic high. A carbon price of NZD 235 (USD 153) would increase the annual domestic transport expenditure of lower income households by NZD 670 (USD 436), a 42% increase. A carbon tax is marginally preferred by interviewed experts to an increase in prices under the current ETS. © 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
英文关键词Carbon tax; cost estimations; ETS; mitigation potential; price elasticity; transport emissions
语种英语
scopus关键词car use; carbon emission; demand elasticity; emission control; holistic approach; multicriteria analysis; pollution tax; New Zealand
来源期刊Climate Policy
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/153278
作者单位School of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand; New Zealand Climate Change Research Institute, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand; New Zealand Climate Change Research Institute; and School of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Hasan M.A.,Frame D.J.,Chapman R.,et al. Curbing the car: the mitigation potential of a higher carbon price in the New Zealand transport sector[J],2020,20(5).
APA Hasan M.A.,Frame D.J.,Chapman R.,&Archie K.M..(2020).Curbing the car: the mitigation potential of a higher carbon price in the New Zealand transport sector.Climate Policy,20(5).
MLA Hasan M.A.,et al."Curbing the car: the mitigation potential of a higher carbon price in the New Zealand transport sector".Climate Policy 20.5(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Hasan M.A.]的文章
[Frame D.J.]的文章
[Chapman R.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Hasan M.A.]的文章
[Frame D.J.]的文章
[Chapman R.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Hasan M.A.]的文章
[Frame D.J.]的文章
[Chapman R.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。