CCPortal
DOI10.2166/wcc.2014.084
Reconciling collaborative action research with existing institutions: Insights from Dutch and German climate knowledge programmes
Termeer C.; van Buuren A.; Knieling J.; Gottschick M.
发表日期2015
ISSN20402244
起始页码89
结束页码103
卷号6期号:1
英文摘要Researchers and policymakers increasingly aim to set up collaborative research programmes to address the challenges of adaptation to climate change. This does not only apply for technical knowledge, but for governance knowledge also. Both the Netherlands and Germany have set up largescale collaborative action research (CAR) programmes for the governance of adaptation to climate change. Despite the collaborative designs, the initial enthusiasm, the available resources and the many positive outcomes, both programmes encountered several stubborn difficulties. By comparing both programmes, this paper explores the difficulties researchers encounter, analyses the underlying mechanisms and presents some lessons. It found that many difficulties are related to the tensions that exist between the assumptions underlying the new collaborative trajectories and the logics of the existing policy and research institutions. These institutional misfits are decisive to explain ultimate difficulties and successes. Furthermore, the paper concludes that risk aversion, stereotyping and scale fixation strengthen institutional misfits; and that these misfits persist due to lacking bridging capabilities. We suggest some lessons that can help to resolve the difficulties and reconcile CAR into existing institutions: organize the knowledge arrangement as a collaborative process; construct boundary objects as focal point for collaboration; and invest in bridging capabilities. © IWA Publishing 2015.
英文关键词Action research; Climate change; Governance; Institutions; Science–policy interface
语种英语
scopus关键词Societies and institutions; Action research; Adaptation to climate changes; Collaborative action researches; Collaborative process; Collaborative research; Governance; Policy interfaces; Research institutions; Climate change; adaptive management; climate change; environmental policy; governance approach; institutional framework; knowledge; regional climate; Germany; Netherlands
来源期刊Journal of Water and Climate Change
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/148243
作者单位Public Administration and Policy Group, Wageningen University, Netherlands; Department of Public Administration, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Institute of Urban Planning and Regional Development, HafenCity University, Hamburg, Germany; Competence Centrum Sustainable University, Hamburg University, Germany
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Termeer C.,van Buuren A.,Knieling J.,et al. Reconciling collaborative action research with existing institutions: Insights from Dutch and German climate knowledge programmes[J],2015,6(1).
APA Termeer C.,van Buuren A.,Knieling J.,&Gottschick M..(2015).Reconciling collaborative action research with existing institutions: Insights from Dutch and German climate knowledge programmes.Journal of Water and Climate Change,6(1).
MLA Termeer C.,et al."Reconciling collaborative action research with existing institutions: Insights from Dutch and German climate knowledge programmes".Journal of Water and Climate Change 6.1(2015).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Termeer C.]的文章
[van Buuren A.]的文章
[Knieling J.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Termeer C.]的文章
[van Buuren A.]的文章
[Knieling J.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Termeer C.]的文章
[van Buuren A.]的文章
[Knieling J.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。