气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Do state traditions matter? comparing deliberative governance initiatives for climate change adaptation in dutch corporatism and British pluralism

CCPortal

DOI	10.2166/wcc.2014.119
	Do state traditions matter? comparing deliberative governance initiatives for climate change adaptation in dutch corporatism and British pluralism
	Vink M.J.; Benson D.; Boezeman D.; Cook H.; Dewulf A.; Termeer C.
发表日期	2015
ISSN	20402244
起始页码	71
结束页码	88
卷号	6 期号:1
英文摘要	In the emerging field of climate adaptation, deliberative governance initiatives are proposed to yield better adaptation strategies. However, introducing these network-centred deliberations between public and private players may contrast with institutionalized traditions of interest intermediation between state and society. This paper shows how these so-called state traditions affect the processes and outcomes of newly set up deliberative governance initiatives. Because of the similarities in geographical characteristics and the differences in state tradition we conducted a qualitative case study comparison of Dutch and British water management. Our comparison is two-fold. First, we compare deliberative governance initiatives in the different state traditions of the Netherlands and UK. Second, we compare the newly set up deliberative governance initiative to an existing policy regime mainstreaming climate adaptation in a similar state tradition, in our case the Netherlands. We find that: (1) deliberative governance initiatives in the corporatist state tradition of the Netherlands yields learning but shows apathy among politically elected decision-makers compared to deliberative governance initiatives in the pluralist state tradition of the UK where clearly defined rules and responsibilities yields negotiation and action; and (2) a typical corporatist policy regime mainstreaming climate adaption in a corporatist state tradition yields effective and legitimate policy formation but lacks learning. © IWA Publishing 2015.
英文关键词	Adaptive water management; Climate adaptation; Deliberative governance; Frame analysis; Participation; Powering; Puzzling; United Kingdom and the Netherlands
语种	英语
scopus关键词	Decision making; Public policy; Water management; Adaptive water managements; Climate adaptation; Deliberative governance; Frame analysis; Netherlands; Participation; Powering; Puzzling; Climate change; adaptive management; climate change; comparative study; environmental policy; governance approach; water management; Netherlands; United Kingdom
来源期刊	Journal of Water and Climate Change
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/148242
作者单位	Public Administration and Policy Group, Wageningen University, Netherlands; Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, United Kingdom; Institute for Management Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands; Kingston University, London, United Kingdom
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Vink M.J.,Benson D.,Boezeman D.,et al. Do state traditions matter? comparing deliberative governance initiatives for climate change adaptation in dutch corporatism and British pluralism[J],2015,6(1).
APA	Vink M.J.,Benson D.,Boezeman D.,Cook H.,Dewulf A.,&Termeer C..(2015).Do state traditions matter? comparing deliberative governance initiatives for climate change adaptation in dutch corporatism and British pluralism.Journal of Water and Climate Change,6(1).
MLA	Vink M.J.,et al."Do state traditions matter? comparing deliberative governance initiatives for climate change adaptation in dutch corporatism and British pluralism".Journal of Water and Climate Change 6.1(2015).