CCPortal
DOI10.1007/s10584-018-2355-3
How to evaluate a monitoring system for adaptive policies: criteria for signposts selection and their model-based evaluation
Raso L.; Kwakkel J.; Timmermans J.; Panthou G.
发表日期2019
ISSN0165-0009
起始页码267
结束页码283
卷号153期号:2020-01-02
英文摘要Adaptive policies have emerged as a valuable strategy for dealing with uncertainties by recognising the capacity of systems to adapt over time to new circumstances and surprises. The efficacy of adaptive policies hinges on detecting on-going change and ensuring that actions are indeed taken if and when necessary. This is operationalised by including a monitoring system composed of signposts and triggers in the design of the plan. A well-designed monitoring system is indispensable for the effective implementation of adaptive policies. Despite the importance of monitoring for adaptive policies, the present literature has not considered criteria enabling the a-priori evaluation of the efficacy of signposts. In this paper, we introduce criteria for the evaluation of individual signposts and the monitoring system as a whole. These criteria are relevance, observability, completeness, and parsimony. These criteria are intended to enhance the capacity to detect the need for adaptation in the presence of noisy and ambiguous observations of the real system. The criteria are identified from an analysis of the information chain, from system observations to policy success, focusing on how data becomes information. We illustrate how models, in particular, the combined use of stochastic and exploratory modelling can be used to assess individual signposts, and the whole monitoring system according to these criteria. This analysis provides significant insight into critical factors that may hinder learning from data. The proposed criteria are demonstrated using a hypothetical case, in which a monitoring system for a flood protection policy in the Niger River is designed and tested. © 2019, Springer Nature B.V.
英文关键词Adaptive policies; Climate change; Deep uncertainty; Dynamic adaptive policy pathways; Evidence based; Extremes; Flood management; Information; Monitoring; Monitoring; Niger River; Signposts
语种英语
scopus关键词Climate change; Flood control; Floods; Stochastic models; Stochastic systems; Adaptive policy; Deep uncertainties; Dynamic-adaptive; Evidence-based; Extremes; Flood management; Information; Niger; Signposts; Monitoring; adaptive management; climate change; climate modeling; environmental monitoring; environmental policy; extreme event; flood control; implementation process; information management; monitoring system; uncertainty analysis; Niger River
来源期刊Climatic Change
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/147528
作者单位Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, Delft, 2628 BX, Netherlands; Université Grenoble-Alpes, 38 058 Grenoble Cedex 9, Grenoble, France
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Raso L.,Kwakkel J.,Timmermans J.,et al. How to evaluate a monitoring system for adaptive policies: criteria for signposts selection and their model-based evaluation[J],2019,153(2020-01-02).
APA Raso L.,Kwakkel J.,Timmermans J.,&Panthou G..(2019).How to evaluate a monitoring system for adaptive policies: criteria for signposts selection and their model-based evaluation.Climatic Change,153(2020-01-02).
MLA Raso L.,et al."How to evaluate a monitoring system for adaptive policies: criteria for signposts selection and their model-based evaluation".Climatic Change 153.2020-01-02(2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Raso L.]的文章
[Kwakkel J.]的文章
[Timmermans J.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Raso L.]的文章
[Kwakkel J.]的文章
[Timmermans J.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Raso L.]的文章
[Kwakkel J.]的文章
[Timmermans J.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。