Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1007/s10584-020-02854-8 |
Streamflow-based evaluation of climate model sub-selection methods | |
Kiesel J.; Stanzel P.; Kling H.; Fohrer N.; Jähnig S.C.; Pechlivanidis I. | |
发表日期 | 2020 |
ISSN | 0165-0009 |
英文摘要 | The assessment of climate change and its impact relies on the ensemble of models available and/or sub-selected. However, an assessment of the validity of simulated climate change impacts is not straightforward because historical data is commonly used for bias-adjustment, to select ensemble members or to define a baseline against which impacts are compared—and, naturally, there are no observations to evaluate future projections. We hypothesize that historical streamflow observations contain valuable information to investigate practices for the selection of model ensembles. The Danube River at Vienna is used as a case study, with EURO-CORDEX climate simulations driving the COSERO hydrological model. For each selection method, we compare observed to simulated streamflow shift from the reference period (1960–1989) to the evaluation period (1990–2014). Comparison against no selection shows that an informed selection of ensemble members improves the quantification of climate change impacts. However, the selection method matters, with model selection based on hindcasted climate or streamflow alone is misleading, while methods that maintain the diversity and information content of the full ensemble are favorable. Prior to carrying out climate impact assessments, we propose splitting the long-term historical data and using it to test climate model performance, sub-selection methods, and their agreement in reproducing the indicator of interest, which further provide the expectable benchmark of near- and far-future impact assessments. This test is well-suited to be applied in multi-basin experiments to obtain better understanding of uncertainty propagation and more universal recommendations regarding uncertainty reduction in hydrological impact studies. © 2020, The Author(s). |
英文关键词 | Climate change impact; Climate uncertainty; Ensemble selection; EURO-CORDEX; Hindcast |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Benchmarking; Climate change; Stream flow; Climate change impact; Climate impact assessment; Ensemble of models; Hydrological impacts; Hydrological modeling; Information contents; Uncertainty propagation; Uncertainty reduction; Climate models |
来源期刊 | Climatic Change |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/147292 |
作者单位 | Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Natural Resource Conservation, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel, Germany; AFRY Austria GmbH, Hydro Consulting, Vienna, Austria; Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Kiesel J.,Stanzel P.,Kling H.,et al. Streamflow-based evaluation of climate model sub-selection methods[J],2020. |
APA | Kiesel J.,Stanzel P.,Kling H.,Fohrer N.,Jähnig S.C.,&Pechlivanidis I..(2020).Streamflow-based evaluation of climate model sub-selection methods.Climatic Change. |
MLA | Kiesel J.,et al."Streamflow-based evaluation of climate model sub-selection methods".Climatic Change (2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。