气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): National print media vs. agricultural trade publications: communicating the 2012 Midwestern US drought

CCPortal

DOI	10.1007/s10584-019-02630-3
	National print media vs. agricultural trade publications: communicating the 2012 Midwestern US drought
	Church S.P.; Bentlage B.; Weiner R.; Babin N.; Bulla B.R.; Fagan K.; Haigh T.; Carlton J.S.; Prokopy L.S.
发表日期	2020
ISSN	0165-0009
起始页码	43
结束页码	63
卷号	161 期号:1
英文摘要	The 2012 Midwestern US drought resulted in major impacts to farmers and the public. Extreme events like drought will continue in the future due to climate change. We studied how the elite national press—New York Times (NYT) and Wall Street Journal (WSJ)—covered the 2012 Midwestern drought, how climate change was addressed, and how NYT and WSJ articles differed from each other and agricultural trade publication (ATP) article coverage before, during, and after the drought. A previous study found that ATP articles emphasized short-term drought recovery efforts. We suggest this emphasis was exacerbated by how drought and climate change were reported in the national media. Few articles discussed climate change in all publication types. Most articles that did cover climate change did not attribute a cause; however, over half of NYT articles mentioned human-caused climate change. WSJ and ATP articles had more content similarities than NYT articles. Overall, climate change discussions in all publication types were related to personal impacts. Climate change reporting in the WSJ and NYT was broad. ATP climate change reporting related to weather conditions in relation to farm resilience. Focusing on impacts and recovery may have attenuated risk perceptions. We contend that communication should recognize human-caused climate change and increased likelihood of weather extremes. © 2020, Springer Nature B.V.
英文关键词	Agricultural trade publications; Climate change communication; New York Times; Social amplification of risk; The 2012 Midwestern US drought; Wall Street Journal
语种	英语
scopus关键词	Agriculture; Commerce; Drought; Publishing; Risk perception; Agricultural trade publications; Content similarity; Extreme events; New york time; Print media; Social amplification of risks; Wall Street Journal; Weather extremes; Climate change; agricultural trade; climate change; communication; drought; extreme event; human activity; mass media; maximum likelihood analysis; nature-society relations; risk perception; New York [United States]; United States
来源期刊	Climatic Change
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/147151
作者单位	Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Traphagen Hall 217, Bozeman, MT 59717, United States; Verdis Group, 950 S. 10th Street #010, Omaha, NE 68108, United States; Department of Forestry & Natural Resources, Purdue University, 195 Marsteller St., West Lafayette, IN 47906, United States; Natural Resources Management and Environmental Sciences Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, United States; Department of Government and Justice Studies, Appalachian State University, 224 Joyce Lawrence Lane ASU Box 32107, Boone, NC 28608, United States; National Drought Mitigation Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 3310 Holdrege St., Lincoln, NE 68583-0988, United States; Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant, 195 Marsteller Street, West Lafayette, IN 47906, United States
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Church S.P.,Bentlage B.,Weiner R.,et al. National print media vs. agricultural trade publications: communicating the 2012 Midwestern US drought[J],2020,161(1).
APA	Church S.P..,Bentlage B..,Weiner R..,Babin N..,Bulla B.R..,...&Prokopy L.S..(2020).National print media vs. agricultural trade publications: communicating the 2012 Midwestern US drought.Climatic Change,161(1).
MLA	Church S.P.,et al."National print media vs. agricultural trade publications: communicating the 2012 Midwestern US drought".Climatic Change 161.1(2020).