Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1007/s10584-020-02683-9 |
Governance of climate adaptation; which mode? An exploration of stakeholder viewpoints on how to organize adaptation | |
Molenveld A.; van Buuren A.; Ellen G.-J. | |
发表日期 | 2020 |
ISSN | 0165-0009 |
起始页码 | 233 |
结束页码 | 254 |
卷号 | 162期号:2 |
英文摘要 | There are many normative answers on the question how to realize climate adaptation, ranging from pleas for the government to play a decisive role, to calls for refraining from action and relying upon spontaneous adaptation of both government and non-governmental actors. In this article, we present a Q methodological study, aimed at investigating the governance preferences among non-governmental actors in the Netherlands and the “narratives” they use to motivate these preferences. Our empirical results underline the fact that the question “how to organize adaptation”, is a controversial one. The results resemble the various positions in the current academic debate about the governance of adaptation, and add important insights and nuances to it. Many respondents feel that the current climate adaptation policy is too non-committal. The dominant viewpoint underscores a need for more rules and norms and the possibility to sanction organizations that do not adapt. Minority viewpoints show an urge to stimulate and support self-organization of partners, as well as a need for more action. However, financial and regulatory preconditions are needed to stimulate actors in order to see to the necessary investments. Policy-makers have to invest in mixing their policy instruments. Clearly, most nongovernmental actors are in favor of the government setting a framework with rules and norms for climate adaption. However, the viewpoints show that this is not sufficient. The government should facilitate networks, joint efforts and create the financial and regulatory preconditions to remove current barriers blocking adaptation measures. © 2020, The Author(s). |
英文关键词 | Climate adaptation; Governance; Q methodology; Stakeholder perspectives |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Climate change; Climate models; Adaptation policies; Current barriers; Methodological studies; Netherlands; Policy instruments; Policy makers; Support-self organization; Public policy; action plan; adaptive management; climate change; environmental economics; environmental policy; exploration; governance approach; government; methodology; nongovernmental organization; policy making; regulatory approach; stakeholder; Netherlands |
来源期刊 | Climatic Change |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/147096 |
作者单位 | Department of Public Administration and Sociology, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Research Group on Politics & Public Governance, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, 2000, Belgium; Deltares, Delft, Netherlands |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Molenveld A.,van Buuren A.,Ellen G.-J.. Governance of climate adaptation; which mode? An exploration of stakeholder viewpoints on how to organize adaptation[J],2020,162(2). |
APA | Molenveld A.,van Buuren A.,&Ellen G.-J..(2020).Governance of climate adaptation; which mode? An exploration of stakeholder viewpoints on how to organize adaptation.Climatic Change,162(2). |
MLA | Molenveld A.,et al."Governance of climate adaptation; which mode? An exploration of stakeholder viewpoints on how to organize adaptation".Climatic Change 162.2(2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。