Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1007/s10584-020-02768-5 |
Design and change in transboundary freshwater agreements | |
De Bruyne C.; Fischhendler I.; Haftel Y.Z. | |
发表日期 | 2020 |
ISSN | 0165-0009 |
起始页码 | 321 |
结束页码 | 341 |
卷号 | 162期号:2 |
英文摘要 | This paper presents a systematic assessment of transboundary water treaties and their institutional evolution over time. While the majority of treaties tend to remain unchanged, others are renegotiated over time, either gradually by treaty amendment or abruptly by treaty replacement. This study examines the sources of treaty amendment, treaty replacement, and renegotiation. Treaty design features, such as conflict resolution mechanisms and duration mechanisms, make up the set of independent variables. Effects are also measured for a set of control variables including the geographical configuration of a basin, the number of signatories, a history of interstate militarized disputes, water variability, the basin’s climate zone, and past renegotiations. Conflict resolution appears as a significant design feature for determining treaty stability, aided by asymmetrical basin configurations and bilateralism. The absence of conflict resolution is the main trigger for gradual change. The presence of a duration clause and a history of interstate militarized disputes are found to trigger abrupt change. Renegotiations become more likely after the first round of renegotiation, suggesting a temporal effect of path dependence on treaty evolution. This study adds to the work of scholars mapping transboundary basins at risk and provides further arguments to negotiate better and more specific treaties from the start, which include conflict resolution features that enable dialogue and rule modification while avoiding the need for formal treaty renegotiation. © 2020, Springer Nature B.V. |
英文关键词 | Conflict resolution; Flexibility mechanisms; Gradualism; Institutional evolution; Institutional resilience; International agreements; Transboundary water treaties |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Climate change; Climate models; Conflict Resolution; Conflict resolution mechanisms; Control variable; Independent variables; Rule modification; Systematic assessment; Transboundary basins; Transboundary water; Laws and legislation; assessment method; design; institutional framework; mapping; negotiation process; transboundary cooperation; water planning |
来源期刊 | Climatic Change
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/147093 |
作者单位 | Department of Geography, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem, 9190501, Israel; Department of International Relations, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem, 9190501, Israel |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | De Bruyne C.,Fischhendler I.,Haftel Y.Z.. Design and change in transboundary freshwater agreements[J],2020,162(2). |
APA | De Bruyne C.,Fischhendler I.,&Haftel Y.Z..(2020).Design and change in transboundary freshwater agreements.Climatic Change,162(2). |
MLA | De Bruyne C.,et al."Design and change in transboundary freshwater agreements".Climatic Change 162.2(2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。