Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1007/s10584-020-02781-8 |
Integrated assessment of storm surge barrier systems under present and future climates and comparison to alternatives: a case study of Boston; USA | |
Kirshen P.; Borrelli M.; Byrnes J.; Chen R.; Lockwood L.; Watson C.; Starbuck K.; Wiggin J.; Novelly A.; Uiterwyk K.; Thurson K.; McMann B.; Foster C.; Sprague H.; Roberts H.J.; Bosma K.; Jin D.; Herst R. | |
发表日期 | 2020 |
ISSN | 0165-0009 |
起始页码 | 445 |
结束页码 | 464 |
卷号 | 162期号:2 |
英文摘要 | Large-scale barriers are a management option for present and increasing coastal storm flooding. The barriers have gates that are open most times except during storms. As an example of the assessment process for a barrier, an integrated assessment of two barrier options for the coastal city of Boston, located in the northeastern USA, is presented. The assessment also included a comparison to shore-based adaptation options such as elevated walkways, playing fields, and open space. While harbor-wide barriers in Boston could manage storm coastal flooding with perhaps minimal environmental impacts and moderate impacts on harbor users such as shipping, their cost-effectiveness is low. Their operational lives are limited by a rapidly increasing annual number of gate closures over time as sea level rises—placing considerable mechanical stresses on them. With low potential to adapt or adjust a barrier once it is in place, there are limited opportunities to respond to the uncertainties of climate change over time. The alternative of a wide spectrum of shore-based, district-level solutions using nature-based solutions located on the waterfront, however, has the potential for high cost-effectiveness and several key advantages. These solutions have the potential to incorporate multiple levels of protection, manage storm and tidal coastal flooding, provide flexibility and adaptability, offer co-benefits, endure for long operational lifetimes, and cause minimal impacts to the environment and harbor users. © 2020, Springer Nature B.V. |
英文关键词 | Boston; Nature-based solutions; Sea level rise; Storm surge barriers |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Climate change; Cost effectiveness; Environmental impact; Sea level; Storms; Assessment process; Coastal flooding; Integrated assessment; Management options; Mechanical stress; Multiple levels; Operational life; Operational lifetime; Floods; adaptive management; climate change; comparative study; cost analysis; environmental impact assessment; flooding; future prospect; integrated approach; management practice; sea level change; storm surge; Boston; Massachusetts; United States |
来源期刊 | Climatic Change
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/147084 |
作者单位 | School for the Environment, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125, United States; Arcadis, White Plains, NY 10601, United States; The Water Institute of the Gulf, Baton Rouge, LA 70802, United States; Woods Hole Group, Bourne, MA 02532, United States; Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, United States; Sustainable Solutions Laboratory, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125, United States |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Kirshen P.,Borrelli M.,Byrnes J.,et al. Integrated assessment of storm surge barrier systems under present and future climates and comparison to alternatives: a case study of Boston; USA[J],2020,162(2). |
APA | Kirshen P..,Borrelli M..,Byrnes J..,Chen R..,Lockwood L..,...&Herst R..(2020).Integrated assessment of storm surge barrier systems under present and future climates and comparison to alternatives: a case study of Boston; USA.Climatic Change,162(2). |
MLA | Kirshen P.,et al."Integrated assessment of storm surge barrier systems under present and future climates and comparison to alternatives: a case study of Boston; USA".Climatic Change 162.2(2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。