CCPortal
DOI10.5194/cp-16-1493-2020
An empirical evaluation of bias correction methods for palaeoclimate simulations
Beyer R.; Krapp M.; Manica A.
发表日期2020
ISSN18149324
起始页码1493
结束页码1508
卷号16期号:4
英文摘要Even the most sophisticated global climate models are known to have significant biases in the way they simulate the climate system. Correcting model biases is therefore an essential step towards realistic palaeoclimatologies, which are important for many applications such as modelling long-term ecological dynamics. Here, we evaluate three widely used bias correction methods the delta method, generalised additive models (GAMs), and quantile mapping against a large global dataset of empirical temperature and precipitation records from the present, the mid-Holocene (∼6000 years BP), the Last Glacial Maximum (∼ 21000 years BP), and the last interglacial period (∼ 125000 years BP). In most cases, the differences between the bias reductions achieved by the three methods are small. Overall, the delta method performs slightly better, albeit not always to a statistically significant degree, at minimising the median absolute bias between empirical data and debiased simulations for both temperature and precipitation than GAMs and quantile mapping; however, there is considerable spatial and temporal variation in the performance of each of the three methods. Our data also indicate that it could soon be possible to use empirical reconstructions of past climatic conditions not only for the evaluation of bias correction methods but for fitting statistical relationships between empirical and simulated data through time that can inform more effective bias correction methods. © Author(s) 2020.
语种英语
scopus关键词climate modeling; climate variation; correction; empirical analysis; global climate; Holocene; Last Glacial Maximum; paleoclimate; precipitation (climatology); sampling bias; temperature
来源期刊Climate of the Past
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/146684
作者单位Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Beyer R.,Krapp M.,Manica A.. An empirical evaluation of bias correction methods for palaeoclimate simulations[J],2020,16(4).
APA Beyer R.,Krapp M.,&Manica A..(2020).An empirical evaluation of bias correction methods for palaeoclimate simulations.Climate of the Past,16(4).
MLA Beyer R.,et al."An empirical evaluation of bias correction methods for palaeoclimate simulations".Climate of the Past 16.4(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Beyer R.]的文章
[Krapp M.]的文章
[Manica A.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Beyer R.]的文章
[Krapp M.]的文章
[Manica A.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Beyer R.]的文章
[Krapp M.]的文章
[Manica A.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。