Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.5194/acp-19-2165-2019 |
Surface erythemal UV irradiance in the continental United States derived from ground-based and OMI observations: Quality assessment; trend analysis and sampling issues | |
Zhang H.; Wang J.; García L.C.; Zeng J.; Dennhardt C.; Liu Y.; Krotkov N.A. | |
发表日期 | 2019 |
ISSN | 16807316 |
起始页码 | 2165 |
结束页码 | 2181 |
卷号 | 19期号:4 |
英文摘要 | Surface full-sky erythemal dose rate (EDR) from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) at both satellite overpass time and local noon time is evaluated against ground measurements at 31 sites from the US Department of Agriculture's (USDA) UV-B Monitoring and Research Program (UVMRP) over the period of 2005-2017. We find that both OMI overpass and solar noon time EDR are highly correlated with the measured counterparts (with a linear correlation coefficient of 0.90 and 0.88, respectively). Although the comparison statistics are improved with a longer time window (0.5-1.0 h) for pairing surface and OMI measurements, both OMI overpass and local noon time EDRs have 7 % overestimation that is larger than 6 % uncertainty in the ground measurements and show different levels of dependence on solar zenith angle (SZA) and to lesser extent on cloud optical depth. The ratio of EDR between local noon and OMI overpass time is often (95 % in frequency) larger than 1 with a mean of 1.18 in the OMI product; in contrast, the same ratio from surface observation is normally distributed with 22 % of the times less than 1 and a mean of 1.38. This contrast in part reflects the deficiency in the OMI surface UV algorithm that assumes constant atmospheric conditions between overpass and noon time. The probability density functions (PDFs) for both OMI and ground measurements of noontime EDR are in statistically significant agreement, showing dual peaks at ∼20 and ∼200 mW m -2 , respectively; the latter is lower than 220 mW m -2 , the value at which the PDF of daily EDR from ground measurements peaks, and this difference indicates that the largest EDR value for a given day may not often occur at local noon. Lastly, statistically significant positive trends of EDR are found in the northeastern US in OMI data, but opposite trends are found within ground-based data (regardless of sampling for either noontime or daily averages). While positive trends are consistently found between OMI and surface data for EDR over the southern Great Plains (Texas and Oklahoma), their values are within the uncertainty of ground measurements. Overall, no scientifically sound trends can be found among OMI data for aerosol total and absorbing optical depth, cloud optical depth and total ozone to explain coherently the surface UV trends revealed either by OMI or ground-based estimates; these data also cannot reconcile trend differences between the two estimates (of EDR from OMI and surface observations). Future geostationary satellites with better spatiotemporal resolution data should help overcome spatiotemporal sampling issues inherent in OMI data products and therefore improve the estimates of surface UV flux and EDR from space. © 2019 Author(s). |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | aerosol; air quality; environmental monitoring; ground-based measurement; irradiance; observational method; optical depth; ozone; sampling; trend analysis; ultraviolet radiation; Great Plains; Oklahoma [United States]; Texas; United States |
来源期刊 | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/144634 |
作者单位 | Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States; Center for Global and Regional Environmental Research, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States; National Weather Service, El Paso, TX, United States; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States; NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Zhang H.,Wang J.,García L.C.,et al. Surface erythemal UV irradiance in the continental United States derived from ground-based and OMI observations: Quality assessment; trend analysis and sampling issues[J],2019,19(4). |
APA | Zhang H..,Wang J..,García L.C..,Zeng J..,Dennhardt C..,...&Krotkov N.A..(2019).Surface erythemal UV irradiance in the continental United States derived from ground-based and OMI observations: Quality assessment; trend analysis and sampling issues.Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,19(4). |
MLA | Zhang H.,et al."Surface erythemal UV irradiance in the continental United States derived from ground-based and OMI observations: Quality assessment; trend analysis and sampling issues".Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 19.4(2019). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。