CCPortal
DOI10.5194/acp-19-6085-2019
How robust are stratospheric age of air trends from different reanalyses?
Ploeger F.; Legras B.; Charlesworth E.; Yan X.; Diallo M.; Konopka P.; Birner T.; Tao M.; Engel A.; Riese M.
发表日期2019
ISSN16807316
起始页码6085
结束页码6105
卷号19期号:9
英文摘要

An accelerating Brewer-Dobson circulation (BDC) is a robust signal of climate change in model predictions but has been questioned by trace gas observations. We analyse the stratospheric mean age of air and the full age spectrum as measures for the BDC and its trend. Age of air is calculated using the Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS) driven by ERA-Interim, JRA-55 and MERRA-2 reanalysis data to assess the robustness of the representation of the BDC in current generation meteorological reanalyses. We find that the climatological mean age significantly depends on the reanalysis, with JRA-55 showing the youngest and MERRA-2 the oldest mean age. Consideration of the age spectrum indicates that the older air for MERRA-2 is related to a stronger spectrum tail, which is likely associated with weaker tropical upwelling and stronger recirculation. Seasonality of stratospheric transport is robustly represented in reanalyses, with similar mean age variations and age spectrum peaks. Long-Term changes from 1989 to 2015 turn out to be similar for the reanalyses with mainly decreasing mean age accompanied by a shift of the age spectrum peak towards shorter transit times, resembling the forced response in climate model simulations to increasing greenhouse gas concentrations. For the shorter periods, 1989-2001 and 2002-2015, the age of air changes are less robust. Only ERA-Interim shows the hemispheric dipole pattern in age changes from 2002 to 2015 as viewed by recent satellite observations. Consequently, the representation of decadal variability of the BDC in current generation reanalyses appears less robust and is a major uncertainty of modelling the BDC.

© Author(s) 2019.
语种英语
scopus关键词atmospheric circulation; climate modeling; climatology; Lagrangian analysis; long-term change; seasonality; stratosphere; trend analysis; Bivalvia
来源期刊Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/144432
作者单位Institute for Energy and Climate Research: Stratosphere (IEK-7), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany; Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Research, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany; Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, IPSL UPMC/ENS/CNRS/Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, UMR8539, France; Meteorological Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany; Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Luft-und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Ploeger F.,Legras B.,Charlesworth E.,et al. How robust are stratospheric age of air trends from different reanalyses?[J],2019,19(9).
APA Ploeger F..,Legras B..,Charlesworth E..,Yan X..,Diallo M..,...&Riese M..(2019).How robust are stratospheric age of air trends from different reanalyses?.Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,19(9).
MLA Ploeger F.,et al."How robust are stratospheric age of air trends from different reanalyses?".Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 19.9(2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Ploeger F.]的文章
[Legras B.]的文章
[Charlesworth E.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Ploeger F.]的文章
[Legras B.]的文章
[Charlesworth E.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Ploeger F.]的文章
[Legras B.]的文章
[Charlesworth E.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。