CCPortal
DOI10.5194/acp-19-9125-2019
Biomass burning aerosol over the Amazon: analysis of aircraft; surface and satellite observations using a global aerosol model
Reddington C.L.; Morgan W.T.; Darbyshire E.; Brito J.; Coe H.; Artaxo P.; Scott C.E.; Marsham J.; Spracklen D.V.
发表日期2019
ISSN16807316
起始页码9125
结束页码9152
卷号19期号:14
英文摘要Vegetation fires emit large quantities of aerosol into the atmosphere, impacting regional air quality and climate. Previous work has used comparisons of simulated and observed aerosol optical depth (AOD) in regions heavily impacted by fires to suggest that emissions of aerosol particles from fires may be underestimated by a factor of 2-5. Here we use surface, aircraft and satellite observations made over the Amazon during September 2012, along with a global aerosol model to improve understanding of aerosol emissions from vegetation fires. We apply three different satellite-derived fire emission datasets (FINN, GFED, GFAS) in the model. Daily mean aerosol emissions in these datasets vary by up to a factor of 3.7 over the Amazon during this period, highlighting the considerable uncertainty in emissions. We find variable agreement between the model and observed aerosol mass concentrations. The model reproduces observed aerosol concentrations over deforestation fires well in the western Amazon during dry season conditions with FINN or GFED emissions and during dry-wet transition season conditions with GFAS emissions. In contrast, the model underestimates aerosol concentrations over savanna fires in the Cerrado environment east of the Amazon Basin with all three fire emission datasets. The model generally underestimates AOD compared to satellite and ground stations, even when the model reproduces the observed vertical profile of aerosol mass concentration. We suggest it is likely caused by uncertainties in the calculation of AOD, which are as large as ĝ1/490 %, with the largest sensitivities due to uncertainties in water uptake and relative humidity. Overall, we do not find evidence that particulate emissions from fires are systematically underestimated in the Amazon region and we caution against using comparison with AOD to constrain particulate emissions from fires. © Author(s) 2019.
语种英语
scopus关键词aerosol; airborne survey; atmospheric modeling; biomass burning; satellite imagery; vegetation; Amazonia
来源期刊Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/144274
作者单位School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Centre of Atmospheric Sciences, School of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Physics Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Laboratoire de Météorologie Physique, Université Clermont Auvergne, Aubière, France
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Reddington C.L.,Morgan W.T.,Darbyshire E.,et al. Biomass burning aerosol over the Amazon: analysis of aircraft; surface and satellite observations using a global aerosol model[J],2019,19(14).
APA Reddington C.L..,Morgan W.T..,Darbyshire E..,Brito J..,Coe H..,...&Spracklen D.V..(2019).Biomass burning aerosol over the Amazon: analysis of aircraft; surface and satellite observations using a global aerosol model.Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,19(14).
MLA Reddington C.L.,et al."Biomass burning aerosol over the Amazon: analysis of aircraft; surface and satellite observations using a global aerosol model".Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 19.14(2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Reddington C.L.]的文章
[Morgan W.T.]的文章
[Darbyshire E.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Reddington C.L.]的文章
[Morgan W.T.]的文章
[Darbyshire E.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Reddington C.L.]的文章
[Morgan W.T.]的文章
[Darbyshire E.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。