气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Evaluating bundles of interventions to prevent peat-fires in Indonesia

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102154
	Evaluating bundles of interventions to prevent peat-fires in Indonesia
	Carmenta R.; Zabala A.; Trihadmojo B.; Gaveau D.; Salim M.A.; Phelps J.
发表日期	2020
ISSN	0959-3780
英文摘要	The carbon-dense peatlands of Indonesia are a landscape of global importance undergoing rapid land-use change. Here, peat drained for agricultural expansion increases the risk of large-scale uncontrolled fires. Several solutions to this complex environmental, humanitarian and economic crisis have been proposed, such as forest protection measures and agricultural support. However, numerous programmes have largely failed. Bundles of interventions are proposed as promising strategies in integrated approaches, but what policy interventions to combine and how to align such bundles to local conditions remains unclear. We evaluate the impact of two types of interventions and of their combinations, in reducing fire occurrence through driving behavioural change: incentives (i.e. rewards that are conditional on environmental performance), and deterrents (e.g. sanction, soliciting concerns for health). We look at the impact of these interventions in 10 villages with varying landscape and fire-risk contexts in Sumatra, Indonesia. A private-led implementation of a standardised programme allows us to study outcome variability through a natural experiment design. We conduct a systematic cross-case comparison to identify the most effective combinations of interventions, using two-step qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and geospatial and socio-economic survey data (n = 303). We analysed the combined influence of proximate conditions (interventions, e.g. fear of sanction) and remote ones (context; e.g. extent of peat soil) on fire outcomes. We show how, depending on the level of risk in the pre-existing context, certain bundles of interventions are needed to succeed. We found that, despite the programme being framed as rewards-based, people were not responding to the reward alone. Rather sanctions and soliciting concern appeared central to fire prevention, raising important equity implications. Our results contribute to the emerging global interest in peat fire mitigation, and the rapidly developing literature on PES performance. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
英文关键词	Carbon; Governance; Oil palm; Payments for ecosystem services; Public-private; QCA
语种	英语
来源期刊	Global Environmental Change
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/142085
作者单位	Tyndall Centre and School of International Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom; Department of Geography, University of CambridgeCambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, CB3 9EP, United Kingdom; Department of Sociology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States; The Nature Conservancy, Chicago, IL, United States; Independent Scientist, SilviaMap, Bagadou Bas 46600 Martel, France; Independent GIS & Remote Sensing Specialist, SilviaMap, Situgede Bogor Barat 16115, Indonesia; Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YW, United Kingdom
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Carmenta R.,Zabala A.,Trihadmojo B.,et al. Evaluating bundles of interventions to prevent peat-fires in Indonesia[J],2020.
APA	Carmenta R.,Zabala A.,Trihadmojo B.,Gaveau D.,Salim M.A.,&Phelps J..(2020).Evaluating bundles of interventions to prevent peat-fires in Indonesia.Global Environmental Change.
MLA	Carmenta R.,et al."Evaluating bundles of interventions to prevent peat-fires in Indonesia".Global Environmental Change (2020).