气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Robust irrigation system institutions: A global comparison

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102128
	Robust irrigation system institutions: A global comparison
	Ma'Mun S.R.; Loch A.; Young M.D.
发表日期	2020
ISSN	0959-3780
卷号	64
英文摘要	In many places irrigation systems rely on robust governance for continued existence. Elinor Ostrom listed design principles that should achieve robust governance, but doubted that any list could be both necessary and sufficient to result in robust governance. To date, this assumption has never been formally tested. We conduct a meta-analysis and ultimately evaluate 62 case studies via fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to identify necessary/sufficient conditions for robust irrigation system governance. We identify four necessary conditions and seven configurations sufficient for robust governance. Further, we identify a union of conditions that, when absent, are likely to result in system failure. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
英文关键词	Common property; Governance design principles; Qualitative comparative analysis
语种	英语
scopus关键词	comparative study; fuzzy mathematics; global change; governance approach; irrigation system; meta-analysis
来源期刊	Global Environmental Change
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/142015
作者单位	Centre for Global Food and Resources, The University of AdelaideSouth Australia 5005, Australia; Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Muhammadiyah KendariSoutheast Sulawesi 93117, Indonesia
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Ma'Mun S.R.,Loch A.,Young M.D.. Robust irrigation system institutions: A global comparison[J],2020,64.
APA	Ma'Mun S.R.,Loch A.,&Young M.D..(2020).Robust irrigation system institutions: A global comparison.Global Environmental Change,64.
MLA	Ma'Mun S.R.,et al."Robust irrigation system institutions: A global comparison".Global Environmental Change 64(2020).