CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102185
Testing smarter control and feedback with users: Time; temperature and space in household heating preferences and practices in a Living Laboratory
Sovacool B.K.; Osborn J.; Martiskainen M.; Lipson M.
发表日期2020
ISSN0959-3780
卷号65
英文摘要Transitioning to more efficient and less carbon-intensive heating is a monumental policy challenge in the United Kingdom. However, very few households in the UK—and perhaps even elsewhere—have actual experience with state-of-the-art smart heating systems that may utilize enhanced control or feedback. Drawing from a unique sample of actual adopters of smart heating, this study closely examines the heating preferences, practices, and profiles of homes when they are given smarter heating systems. The study utilizes qualitative household data from the Energy System Catapult's Living Laboratory of 100 smart homes in Birmingham (West Midlands), Bridgend (Wales), Manchester (Greater Manchester), and Newcastle (Northumberland). We examine the heating preferences and profiles of participants, with findings inductively organized around the themes of temperature, including tradeoffs between comfort, cost, and value; time, including the utility of heat scheduling; and space, including zonal heating controls. We also discuss patterns of learning, the emergence of environmental values, and issues of discomfort. We conclude by commenting on important distinctions between radiant and ambient heat, as well as between scheduled and on-demand heat. The main findings are 1) tradeoffs between comfort, value and cost occur when it comes to smart heating; 2) people want different numbers of warm hours in their homes at very different times; 3) households chose to heat different numbers of rooms; and 4) there are other non-monetary and non-functional aspects of smart heating that households value. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
英文关键词Big data; Energy feedback; Energy practices; Heating and cooling; Living lab; Smart energy; Smart homes
语种英语
scopus关键词control system; heating; laboratory method; monument; policy making; temperature effect; testing method; trade-off; Australia; Birmingham [England]; Bridgend; England; Greater Manchester; Manchester [England]; Midlands [England]; New South Wales; Newcastle [New South Wales]; Northumberland; United Kingdom; Wales; West Midlands
来源期刊Global Environmental Change
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/141983
作者单位Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), School of Business, Management, and Economics, University of Sussex, United Kingdom; Center for Energy Technologies, Department of Business Development and Technology, Aarhus University, Denmark; Energy Systems Catapult, United Kingdom
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Sovacool B.K.,Osborn J.,Martiskainen M.,et al. Testing smarter control and feedback with users: Time; temperature and space in household heating preferences and practices in a Living Laboratory[J],2020,65.
APA Sovacool B.K.,Osborn J.,Martiskainen M.,&Lipson M..(2020).Testing smarter control and feedback with users: Time; temperature and space in household heating preferences and practices in a Living Laboratory.Global Environmental Change,65.
MLA Sovacool B.K.,et al."Testing smarter control and feedback with users: Time; temperature and space in household heating preferences and practices in a Living Laboratory".Global Environmental Change 65(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Sovacool B.K.]的文章
[Osborn J.]的文章
[Martiskainen M.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Sovacool B.K.]的文章
[Osborn J.]的文章
[Martiskainen M.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Sovacool B.K.]的文章
[Osborn J.]的文章
[Martiskainen M.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。