CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102051
Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services – A case study for Germany
Kleemann J.; Schröter M.; Bagstad K.J.; Kuhlicke C.; Kastner T.; Fridman D.; Schulp C.J.E.; Wolff S.; Martínez-López J.; Koellner T.; Arnhold S.; Martín-López B.; Marques A.; Lopez-Hoffman L.; Liu J.; Kissinger M.; Guerra C.A.; Bonn A.
发表日期2020
ISSN0959-3780
卷号61
英文摘要Despite a growing number of national-scale ecosystem service (ES) assessments, few studies consider the impacts of ES use and consumption beyond national or regional boundaries. Interregional ES flows – ecosystem services “imported” from and “exported” to other countries – are rarely analyzed and their importance for global sustainability is little known. Here, we provide a first multi-ES quantification of a nation's use of ES from abroad. We focus on ES flows that benefit the population in Germany but are supplied outside German territory. We employ a conceptual framework recently developed to systematically quantify interregional ES flows. We address four types of interregional ES flows with: (i) biophysical flows of traded goods: cocoa import for consumption; (ii) flows mediated by migratory species: migration of birds providing pest control; (iii) passive biophysical flows: flood control along transboundary watersheds; and (iv) information flows: China's giant panda loan to the Berlin Zoo. We determined that: (i) Ivory Coast and Ghana alone supply around 53% of Germany's cocoa while major negative consequences for biodiversity occurred in Cameroon and Ecuador; (ii) Africa´s humid and sub-humid climate zones are important habitats for the majority of migratory bird species that provide natural pest control services in agricultural areas in Germany; (iii) Upstream watersheds outside the country add an additional 64% flood regulation services nationally, while Germany exports 40% of flood regulation services in neighboring, downstream countries; (iv) Information flows transported by the pandas were mainly related to political aspects and - contrary to our expectations - considerably less on biological and natural aspects. We discuss the implications of these results for international resource management policy and governance. © 2020 The Authors
关键词agricultural landbiodiversitybiophysicscocoaconceptual frameworkecosystem serviceflood controlhumid environmentpest controlresource managementsustainabilitywatershedCameroonCote dIvoireEcuadorGhanaAiluropoda melanoleucaAvesTheobroma cacao
语种英语
来源机构Global Environmental Change
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/133303
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Kleemann J.,Schröter M.,Bagstad K.J.,等. Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services – A case study for Germany[J]. Global Environmental Change,2020,61.
APA Kleemann J..,Schröter M..,Bagstad K.J..,Kuhlicke C..,Kastner T..,...&Bonn A..(2020).Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services – A case study for Germany.,61.
MLA Kleemann J.,et al."Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services – A case study for Germany".61(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Kleemann J.]的文章
[Schröter M.]的文章
[Bagstad K.J.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Kleemann J.]的文章
[Schröter M.]的文章
[Bagstad K.J.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Kleemann J.]的文章
[Schröter M.]的文章
[Bagstad K.J.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。