CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117699
Using heterogeneity indices to adjust basal area – Leaf area index relationship in managed coniferous stands
Appiah Mensah A.; Petersson H.; Saarela S.; Goude M.; Holmström E.
发表日期2020
ISSN0378-1127
卷号458
英文摘要The structure of contemporary managed forests is complex and deviates from experimental forests which are usually even-aged monocultures and single-storied. To apply theoretical growth and yield functions on managed forests, adjustments are required, especially for leaf area index (LAI) which is a key biophysical variable in process-based growth models. To asses this, the performance of canopy LAI in modelling the basal area (BA) of managed boreal forests dominated by Norway spruce (Picea abies (L). Karst) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) was investigated by heterogeneity analysis. The study was based on the assumption that canopy LAI and BA are strongly related and are vital for estimating stand productivity and growth. Managed forests were represented by field data from the 2016 and 2017 Swedish National Forest Inventory (NFI) campaigns. Species-specific LAI conversion parameters were applied on the general plant area index (PAI) values from hemispheric fish-eye photos taken from the permanent and temporary NFI sample plots. The heterogeneity analysis was studied in two parts by: (a) ground-based stand structural heterogeneity (SSH) described by species composition, coefficient of tree diameter variation, tree social status and height-diameter ratio, and (b) spectral heterogeneity (SPH) by vegetation and textural indices developed from Sentinel-2. Species-specific final (with heterogeneity metrics) and base (without heterogeneity metrics) models were fitted for BA-LAI and BA-PAI relationships by nonlinear least squares and generalised additive regression functions, respectively. The performance of models was assessed by the root-mean-squared error (RMSE, m2 ha−1) and the relative root-mean-squared error (RelRMSE, %) metrics. For both species, BA-LAI final models (FMs) accounting for heterogeneity resulted in larger explained variance than the base models (BMs). Compared with the BMs, FMs with SSH reduced the variance by 55% in Norway spruce (RMSE = 3.33, RelRMSE = 15.39) and 43% in Scots pine (RMSE = 3.70, RelRMSE = 17.38). The fit between BA-LAI with SPH also showed an improvement for Norway spruce (RMSE = 5.56) and Scots pine (RMSE = 5.66) over the BMs, suggesting the potential use of Sentinel-2 in future growth models. The results of the study suggest that in growth models when extrapolating theoretical growth functions to managed forests, there is a need to calibrate the models with the forest structural heterogeneity. This is important for drawing realistic conclusions from growth and yield modelling of managed stands of Norway spruce and Scots pine. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.
关键词Mean square errorPlants (botany)Boreal forestsGrowth functionsHeterogeneityNorway spruceScots pineSwedenForestrybasal areaboreal forestcanopy architectureconiferous treeleaf arealeaf area indexleast squares methodSentinelsocial statusForestryForestsGrowthHeterogeneityModelsPicea AbiesPinus SylvestrisSwedenNorwaySwedenEquus asinusPicea abiesPinus sylvestris
语种英语
来源机构Forest Ecology and Management
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/133068
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Appiah Mensah A.,Petersson H.,Saarela S.,等. Using heterogeneity indices to adjust basal area – Leaf area index relationship in managed coniferous stands[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2020,458.
APA Appiah Mensah A.,Petersson H.,Saarela S.,Goude M.,&Holmström E..(2020).Using heterogeneity indices to adjust basal area – Leaf area index relationship in managed coniferous stands.,458.
MLA Appiah Mensah A.,et al."Using heterogeneity indices to adjust basal area – Leaf area index relationship in managed coniferous stands".458(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Appiah Mensah A.]的文章
[Petersson H.]的文章
[Saarela S.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Appiah Mensah A.]的文章
[Petersson H.]的文章
[Saarela S.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Appiah Mensah A.]的文章
[Petersson H.]的文章
[Saarela S.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。