CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118327
What is good for birds is not always good for lichens: Interactions between forest structure and species richness in managed boreal forests
Klein J.; Thor G.; Low M.; Sjögren J.; Lindberg E.; Eggers S.
发表日期2020
ISSN0378-1127
卷号473
英文摘要Forestry in the boreal region increasingly replaces natural disturbances in shaping biodiversity. Large-scale removal of small diameter trees (thinning), is ubiquitous in northern European forestry, yet an understanding of how it relates to biodiversity across taxa is lacking. To address this, we examined how two forest structural elements, commonly impacted by forest thinning (i.e. vegetation density in the understory and overstory), are correlated with the species richness of forest-dwelling birds and epiphytic lichens. These taxa were chosen because they likely have opposing habitat demands: epiphytic lichens potentially benefitting from more light in open forests, and birds benefitting from structurally complex forests for foraging, nesting and cover. We used remote sensing tools, already applied in forestry planning, to see if management recommendations could be found that balance the needs of both taxonomic groups within the same forests. Our results show that richness in epiphytic lichens and forest-dwelling birds is not correlated and that a high species richness (~15 birds & ~40 epiphytic lichens) in both taxa is only predicted in the same stand under a specific vertical distribution and density of the forest's vegetation: this occurs when the vegetation above 3 m is open (to promote epiphytic lichen richness) and below 3 m is dense (to promote bird richness). Dense vegetation up to 7 m above ground has a diverging effect on forest birds (positive) and epiphytic lichens (negative). A larger stem diameter further increases species richness in both taxa. Our study provides results that are directly implementable in forestry planning over large areas with the help of remote sensing tools (LiDAR). © 2020 The Author(s)
关键词BiodiversityBirdsFungiHousingRemote sensingTimberVegetationEpiphytic lichensForestry planningNatural disturbanceRemote sensing toolsSpecies richnessStructural elementsVegetation densityVertical distributionsForestryavifaunabiodiversitydeforestationepiphyteforest managementlichenlidarremote sensingspecies richnessstand structurethinningvertical distributionBiodiversityBirdsForestryFungiPlantsRemote SensingAves
语种英语
来源机构Forest Ecology and Management
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/132686
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Klein J.,Thor G.,Low M.,et al. What is good for birds is not always good for lichens: Interactions between forest structure and species richness in managed boreal forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2020,473.
APA Klein J.,Thor G.,Low M.,Sjögren J.,Lindberg E.,&Eggers S..(2020).What is good for birds is not always good for lichens: Interactions between forest structure and species richness in managed boreal forests.,473.
MLA Klein J.,et al."What is good for birds is not always good for lichens: Interactions between forest structure and species richness in managed boreal forests".473(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Klein J.]的文章
[Thor G.]的文章
[Low M.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Klein J.]的文章
[Thor G.]的文章
[Low M.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Klein J.]的文章
[Thor G.]的文章
[Low M.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。