CCPortal
DOI10.5194/acp-20-7393-2020
Why do models perform differently on particulate matter over East Asia? A multi-model intercomparison study for MICS-Asia III
Tan J.; Tan J.; Fu J.S.; Carmichael G.R.; Itahashi S.; Tao Z.; Huang K.; Huang K.; Dong X.; Yamaji K.; Nagashima T.; Wang X.; Liu Y.; Lee H.-J.; Lin C.-Y.; Ge B.; Kajino M.; Zhu J.; Zhang M.; Liao H.; Wang Z.
发表日期2020
ISSN16807316
起始页码7393
结束页码7410
卷号20期号:12
英文摘要This study compares the performance of 12 regional chemical transport models (CTMs) from the third phase of the Model Inter-Comparison Study for Asia (MICSAsia III) on simulating the particulate matter (PM) over East Asia (EA) in 2010. The participating models include the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with Community Multiscale Air Quality (WRF-CMAQ; v4.7.1 and v5.0.2), the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System coupled with CMAQ (RAMS-CMAQ; v4.7.1 and v5.0.2), the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with chemistry (WRF-Chem; v3.6.1 and v3.7.1), Goddard Earth Observing System coupled with chemistry (GEOS-Chem), a non-hydrostatic model coupled with chemistry (NHMChem), the Nested Air Quality Prediction Modeling System (NAQPMS) and the NASA-Unified WRF (NU-WRF). This study investigates three model processes as the possible reasons for different model performances on PM. (1) Models perform very differently in the gas-particle conversion of sulfur (S) and oxidized nitrogen (N). The model differences in sulfur oxidation ratio (50 %) are of the same magnitude as that in SO2 4 concentrations. The gas-particle conversion is one of the main reasons for different model performances on fine mode PM. (2) Models without dust emission modules can perform well on PM10 at non-dust-affected sites but largely underestimate (up to 50 %) the PM10 concentrations at dust sites. The implementation of dust emission modules in the models has largely improved the model accuracies at dust sites (reduce model bias to 20 %). However, both the magnitude and distribution of dust pollution are not fully captured. (3) The amounts of modeled depositions vary among models by 75 %, 39 %, 21% and 38% for S wet, S dry, N wet and N dry depositions, respectively. Large inter-model differences are found in the washout ratios of wet deposition (at most 170% in India) and dry deposition velocities (generally 0.3-2 cm s1 differences over inland regions). © 2020 Copernicus GmbH. All rights reserved.
关键词air qualityatmospheric modelingatmospheric transportCMIPconcentration (composition)dustparticulate matterpredictionweather forecastingFar East
语种英语
来源机构Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/131959
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Tan J.,Tan J.,Fu J.S.,et al. Why do models perform differently on particulate matter over East Asia? A multi-model intercomparison study for MICS-Asia III[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,2020,20(12).
APA Tan J..,Tan J..,Fu J.S..,Carmichael G.R..,Itahashi S..,...&Wang Z..(2020).Why do models perform differently on particulate matter over East Asia? A multi-model intercomparison study for MICS-Asia III.,20(12).
MLA Tan J.,et al."Why do models perform differently on particulate matter over East Asia? A multi-model intercomparison study for MICS-Asia III".20.12(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Tan J.]的文章
[Tan J.]的文章
[Fu J.S.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Tan J.]的文章
[Tan J.]的文章
[Fu J.S.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Tan J.]的文章
[Tan J.]的文章
[Fu J.S.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。