CCPortal
DOI10.1002/wcc.625
Four scenarios of the energy transition: Drivers, consequences, and implications for geopolitics
Bazilian M.; Bradshaw M.; Gabriel J.; Goldthau A.; Westphal K.
发表日期2020
ISSN1757-7780
EISSN1757-7779
卷号11期号:2
英文摘要This opinion article offers insights into the geopolitics of the ongoing global energy transition. In doing so, it draws heavily on a workshop in Berlin in late 2018, and a subsequent paper in the journal Nature. Four scenarios are presented. First, the “Big Green Deal” offers a positive story of the future, under the assumption that there will be a multilateral approach to tackling climate change. Second, “Dirty Nationalism” explores the fallout of nations choosing to turn inward and pursue a short-term, protectionist, and self-interested agenda. Third, “Technology Breakthrough” illustrates how a technological leap forward could lead to a great power rivalry and distinct regional energy blocs. Finally, “Muddling On” investigates the outcome of an energy transition that reflect business as usual. By comparing and contrasting the different scenarios, the article highlights the potential winners and losers of the different scenarios, and the geopolitical consequences. It also sketches the implications for policy, theory, and scenario thinking more broadly. This article is categorized under: Integrated Assessment of Climate Change > Integrated Scenario Development The Carbon Economy and Climate Mitigation > Future of Global Energy. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
英文关键词energy transition; geopolitics; scenarios
语种英语
scopus关键词Business-as-usual; Carbon economy; Climate mitigations; Energy transitions; geopolitics; Integrated assessment; Scenario development; scenarios; Climate change; alternative energy; climate change; energy policy; geopolitics; integrated approach; scenario analysis; Berlin; Germany
来源期刊Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/129901
作者单位Colorado School of Mines, Payne Institute, Golden, CO, United States; Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; Foresight Intelligence, Berlin, Germany; Willy Brandt School of Public Policy at the University of Erfurt, Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam, Germany; Global Issues Division and Head of Geopolitics of Energy Transformation (GET 2030) Project, Institute for International and Security Affairs, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Berlin, Germany
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Bazilian M.,Bradshaw M.,Gabriel J.,et al. Four scenarios of the energy transition: Drivers, consequences, and implications for geopolitics[J],2020,11(2).
APA Bazilian M.,Bradshaw M.,Gabriel J.,Goldthau A.,&Westphal K..(2020).Four scenarios of the energy transition: Drivers, consequences, and implications for geopolitics.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change,11(2).
MLA Bazilian M.,et al."Four scenarios of the energy transition: Drivers, consequences, and implications for geopolitics".Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 11.2(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Bazilian M.]的文章
[Bradshaw M.]的文章
[Gabriel J.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Bazilian M.]的文章
[Bradshaw M.]的文章
[Gabriel J.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Bazilian M.]的文章
[Bradshaw M.]的文章
[Gabriel J.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。