Climate Change Data Portal
| DOI | 10.1002/wcc.638 |
| Is real options analysis fit for purpose in supporting climate adaptation planning and decision-making? | |
| Kwakkel J.H. | |
| 发表日期 | 2020 |
| ISSN | 1757-7780 |
| EISSN | 1757-7779 |
| 卷号 | 11期号:3 |
| 英文摘要 | Even though real options analysis (ROA) is often thought as the best tool available for evaluating flexible strategies, there are profound problems with the assumptions underpinning ROA rendering it unsuitable for use in supporting planning and decision-making on climate adaptation. In the face of dynamic and deep uncertainty about the future, flexible strategies which can be adapted in response to how the uncertainty is resolving are attractive. Traditional cost-benefit analysis cannot account for the value created through optionality. ROA sets out to amend this. There are however several profound problems with how ROA tries to do this. It is typically not clear what is the baseline plan, without options, against which value is to be estimated. Different baselines significantly change option value. Even if option value can unequivocally be established for a given scenario, ROA relies on expected values over a set of scenarios. First, this requires assigning weights, or probabilities, to scenarios. Given the long-time horizon involved in climate adaptation, these probabilities are meaningless. Second, the expected value over a set of scenarios need not obtain in any single scenario and is thus not a meaningful summary of option value. This article is categorized under: Climate Economics > Iterative Risk-Management Policy Portfolios. © 2020 The Author. WIREs Climate Change published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
| 英文关键词 | bioinformatics; docking; lead optimization; machine learning; virtual screening |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| scopus关键词 | Bioinformatics; Decision making; Docking; Learning systems; Risk management; Value engineering; Deep uncertainties; Expected values; Fit for purpose; Flexible strategies; Lead optimization; Management policy; Real options analysis; Virtual Screening; Cost benefit analysis; adaptive management; climate change; cost-benefit analysis; decision making; numerical model; probability; uncertainty analysis |
| 来源期刊 | Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
 |
| 文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/129888 |
| 作者单位 | Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Kwakkel J.H.. Is real options analysis fit for purpose in supporting climate adaptation planning and decision-making?[J],2020,11(3). |
| APA | Kwakkel J.H..(2020).Is real options analysis fit for purpose in supporting climate adaptation planning and decision-making?.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change,11(3). |
| MLA | Kwakkel J.H.."Is real options analysis fit for purpose in supporting climate adaptation planning and decision-making?".Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 11.3(2020). |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Kwakkel J.H.]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Kwakkel J.H.]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Kwakkel J.H.]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
