气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): The practice of responsible research and innovation in “climate engineering”

CCPortal

DOI	10.1002/wcc.644
	The practice of responsible research and innovation in “climate engineering”
	Low S.; Buck H.J.
发表日期	2020
ISSN	1757-7780
EISSN	1757-7779
卷号	11 期号:3
英文摘要	Sunlight reflection and carbon removal proposals for “climate engineering” (CE) confront governance challenges that many emerging technologies face: their futures are uncertain, and by the time one can discern their shape or impacts, vested interests may block regulation, and publics are often left out of decision-making about them. In response to these challenges, “responsible research and innovation” (RRI) has emerged as a framework to critique and correct for technocratic governance of emerging technologies, and CE has emerged as a prime case of where it can be helpfully applied. However, a critical lens is rarely applied to RRI itself. In this review, we first survey how RRI thinking has already been applied to both carbon removal and sunlight reflection methods for climate intervention. We examine how RRI is employed in four types of activities: Assessment processes and reports, principles and protocols for research governance, critical mappings of research, and deliberative and futuring engagements. Drawing upon this review, we identify tensions in RRI practice, including whether RRI forms or informs choices, the positionalities of RRI practitioners, and ways in which RRI activities enable or disable particular climate interventions. Finally, we recommend that RRI should situate CE within the long arc of sociotechnical proposals for addressing climate change, more actively connect interrogations of the knowledge economy with reparative engagements, include local or actor-specific contexts, design authoritative assessments grounded in RRI, and go beyond treating critique and engagement as “de facto” governance. This article is categorized under: Policy and Governance > Private Governance of Climate Change Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Climate Science and Decision Making. © 2020 The Authors. WIREs Climate Change published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
英文关键词	assessments; climate engineering; governance; research practices; responsible research and innovation
语种	英语
scopus关键词	Carbon; Decision making; Assessment process; assessments; Carbon removal; Climate science; Emerging technologies; governance; Knowledge economy; Reflection methods; Climate change; carbon emission; climate change; decision making; emission control; environmental research; future prospect; governance approach; research work; uncertainty analysis
来源期刊	Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/129886
作者单位	Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam, Germany; Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Low S.,Buck H.J.. The practice of responsible research and innovation in “climate engineering”[J],2020,11(3).
APA	Low S.,&Buck H.J..(2020).The practice of responsible research and innovation in “climate engineering”.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change,11(3).
MLA	Low S.,et al."The practice of responsible research and innovation in “climate engineering”".Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 11.3(2020).